Pakistani Airstrike on Kabul Kills Dozens

On the evening of March 16, Pakistani jets struck a sprawling compound in eastern Kabul that Afghan officials say housed thousands of drug addiction patients. By the following morning, rescue workers were pulling bodies from the rubble of what had been Camp Phoenix — a former NATO military base converted into Afghanistan's largest drug rehabilitation facility. Afghan Interior Ministry spokesman Abdul Mateen Qani said 408 people were killed and 265 injured [1]. Pakistan dismissed the claim as "false and aimed at misleading public opinion," insisting its strikes "precisely targeted military installations and terrorist support infrastructure" [2].

The attack represents the single deadliest incident in what has become an escalating war between two nuclear-armed neighbors — a conflict that has displaced over 115,000 people, killed hundreds of civilians, and drawn muted international response as the world's attention remains fixed on the concurrent U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran.

From Rehab Center to Ground Zero

Camp Phoenix was once home to hundreds of American and British soldiers training the Afghan National Army. After foreign forces withdrew, the Afghan government converted the base into a drug treatment facility around 2015, renaming it the Ibn Sina Drug Addiction Treatment Hospital — later expanded and rebranded as Omid Camp, or "Camp of Hope" [3].

The facility's existence reflected the scale of Afghanistan's addiction crisis: nearly 10% of the country's population — an estimated four million people — struggles with substance abuse, a legacy of decades as the world's leading opium producer [4]. At the time of the strike, approximately 2,000 patients were reportedly undergoing treatment at the facility [1].

Pakistan's government offered a starkly different account of the site. Information Minister Attaullah Tarar alleged the facility was being used to "train terrorists and store weapons," and PM spokesperson Mosharraf Zaidi characterized the operation as "precise, deliberate, and professional" [3]. Some reporting has noted that after the Taliban returned to power in 2021, Camp Phoenix became a dual-use site, with Taliban forces allegedly operating a suicide drone production facility alongside the rehabilitation center [5].

The Norwegian Refugee Council, one of few independent aid organizations still operating in Afghanistan, said its staff visited the hospital the morning after the strike and "found hundreds of civilians dead and injured" [6]. UNAMA, the UN's mission in Afghanistan, notably stopped short of endorsing the Taliban's casualty figures, stating that "dozens" were killed or wounded and making no reference to the rehabilitation center being directly targeted — only that it was "affected" by the strike [7].

How the War Began

The roots of the current conflict stretch back years, but the immediate trigger came on February 21-22, when Pakistan launched airstrikes into Afghanistan's Nangarhar, Paktika, and Khost provinces, targeting camps it said belonged to the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and the Islamic State-Khorasan Province (ISIS-K) [8]. Pakistan described the strikes as retaliation for a wave of terrorist attacks inside its borders, including a February 6 suicide bombing at a Shia mosque in Islamabad that killed 31 people, attacks in Bajaur district that killed 11 security personnel, and additional strikes in Bannu and other areas [9].

The Taliban government promised retaliation. On February 26, Afghan forces attacked Pakistani military positions and border outposts along the 2,611-kilometer Durand Line — the disputed colonial-era border that Afghanistan has never formally recognized [10]. The following day, Pakistan's Defence Minister Khawaja Asif declared that the two countries were now in "open war" [9].

Pakistan launched Operation Ghazab Lil Haq — "Rage for the Righteous Cause" — a sustained air and artillery campaign spanning multiple Afghan provinces including Kabul, Kandahar, Paktia, Nangarhar, Khost, and Paktika. Pakistani forces have relied primarily on air force deep strikes supplemented by drones and long-range artillery, avoiding large ground deployments [11]. By mid-March, Pakistan claimed to have killed 684 Taliban and affiliated fighters [12].

Source: GDELT Project

Data as of Mar 18, 2026CSV

The Civilian Toll

Independent verification of casualties has been nearly impossible. UNAMA recorded at least 185 civilian casualties in Afghanistan — including 56 deaths — between February 26 and March 5 alone, though these figures are preliminary and predate the Camp Phoenix strike [13]. Afghan officials have claimed 110 civilians killed, including 65 women and children, since fighting began — a figure that would balloon dramatically if the Camp Phoenix toll is confirmed [2].

The humanitarian impact extends well beyond direct casualties. The UN refugee agency reported that approximately 115,000 people have been displaced by the fighting [14]. The conflict has also devastated bilateral trade, which had already dropped from $2.46 billion in 2024 to $1.77 billion in 2025 [15]. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk described the situation as piling "misery on misery" on Afghan civilians already enduring one of the world's worst humanitarian crises [16].

The question of dual-use sites — military infrastructure co-located with civilian facilities — has emerged as a central moral and legal issue. If Pakistan knowingly struck a facility housing thousands of drug addiction patients, the attack would likely constitute a violation of international humanitarian law regardless of any military assets present. If the Taliban deliberately co-located military operations with vulnerable civilians, that too could constitute a war crime. Human rights advocates have called for an independent investigation [7].

A War the World Barely Notices

The international response to the conflict has been notably restrained. The United States has explicitly backed Pakistan's position, with Under Secretary of State Allison Hooker expressing "support for Pakistan's right to defend itself against Taliban attacks" [17]. President Trump praised Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Chief of Defence Forces Field Marshal Asim Munir, saying "Pakistan is doing terrifically well" and declining to intervene or mediate [18].

India "strongly" condemned Pakistan's airstrikes, noting they occurred during the holy month of Ramadan [10]. China urged restraint, with Foreign Minister Wang Yi telling Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi that further use of force "would only complicate the situation" [10]. Russia offered to mediate. The UK expressed "deep concern" but stopped well short of taking sides [10].

The muted response reflects a world distracted by competing crises. The U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran, now in its third week, has dominated global attention and diplomatic bandwidth. As Crowdbyte has extensively reported, that conflict has shut down the Strait of Hormuz, sent oil prices above $100 a barrel, and triggered what the IEA has called the largest oil supply disruption in recorded history. Against that backdrop, a war between Pakistan and Afghanistan — two countries with limited leverage over global energy markets — has struggled to command sustained international attention.

Yet the strategic implications are significant. As the Center for Strategic and International Studies has noted, the conflict threatens to undermine counterterrorism operations across the region. ISIS-Khorasan Province stands to benefit from reduced Taliban pressure, and the instability intersects with China's security interests in Central Asia and the broader reshaping of regional alliances [19].

No Off-Ramp in Sight

Pakistan has shown no interest in de-escalation. Officials have stated they are "in no hurry" to end Operation Ghazab Lil Haq, and that strikes will continue until the Taliban provides "credible guarantees" of action against the TTP [11]. The Diplomat assessed in early March that Pakistan's military campaign in Afghanistan "is here to stay," representing not a fleeting retaliation but "a new doctrinal baseline for dealing with Kabul" [11].

The Taliban, for its part, has promised retaliation for the Camp Phoenix strike. The fundamental impasse remains unresolved: Pakistan demands the Taliban crack down on the TTP, but the TTP has pledged allegiance to the Taliban and shares deep ideological ties. Meaningful Taliban action against the TTP would risk fracturing the movement's internal cohesion — a price the Taliban leadership appears unwilling to pay [19].

The Durand Line dispute adds another intractable layer. The 1893 British-drawn border divides ethnic Pashtun populations between the two countries, and Afghanistan's refusal to recognize it predates the Taliban by decades [9].

Source: Crowdbyte analysis of multiple sources

Data as of Mar 18, 2026CSV

What Comes Next

The Camp Phoenix strike has introduced a new dimension to the conflict. If independently verified, a death toll of over 400 at a medical facility would make it one of the deadliest single airstrikes on a civilian target in modern warfare. Even UNAMA's more conservative assessment of "dozens" killed represents a significant escalation in a war that has already shattered the fragile equilibrium along South Asia's most volatile border.

As analyst Michael Kugelman warned: "There are no off-ramps in sight" [1]. With Pakistan entrenched in a sustained military campaign, the Taliban vowing retaliation, the United States backing Islamabad, and the world's diplomatic apparatus consumed by the Iran crisis, the conditions for de-escalation appear virtually nonexistent. The people most likely to pay the price are Afghanistan's civilians — including the millions struggling with addiction who sought treatment at places like Camp Phoenix, only to find that even a hospital offered no sanctuary from war.