Iranian Ayatollah Appeals to Pope for Intervention in Middle East War

As bombs fall on Tehran and missiles arc toward Israel, a handwritten letter from an 80-year-old Iranian scholar to the leader of 1.4 billion Catholics has become one of the most extraordinary diplomatic documents of the 21st century — and a window into a hidden history of dialogue between the Vatican and Shia Islam that may now represent one of the last channels for de-escalation in a rapidly widening war.

The Letter That Crossed a Civilizational Divide

In the days after joint US-Israeli strikes began raining down on Iran on February 28, 2026, Ayatollah Seyed Mostafa Mohaghegh Damad Ahmadabadi — a distinguished jurist, philosopher, and member of Iran's Academy of Sciences — penned an urgent appeal to Pope Leo XIV [1]. The letter, steeped in both Islamic and Christian moral vocabulary, made a direct request: that the Pope use his influence with the American president to halt the bloodshed.

"We respectfully request that Your Holiness, by reminding him of the teachings of Jesus Christ (peace be upon him), guide him so that he refrains from committing such acts and that no more human blood be shed," Damad wrote [1]. The invocation of Jesus — revered as a prophet in Islam — was deliberate, framing the appeal not as a geopolitical maneuver but as a shared moral imperative transcending religious boundaries.

Damad referenced the assassination of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in the opening hours of the strikes, arguing that even in war, governments must uphold humanitarian principles and international law [7]. His letter was not a plea from the Iranian state, but from a religious intellectual invoking a tradition of interfaith dialogue that has quietly persisted for decades.

This was not Damad's first appeal to a pope. In 2018, he wrote to Pope Francis urging Vatican intervention against US sanctions on Iran. In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, he again asked the pontiff to advocate for sanctions relief as Iranians died from the virus [1]. Each letter built on the last, weaving a thread of communication between two religious traditions that the wider world rarely sees.

A War That Shattered Assumptions

The context for Damad's letter is a conflict of staggering proportions. On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched a coordinated military campaign against Iran that marked a dramatic escalation from the Twelve-Day War of June 2025, when Israeli strikes had targeted Iran's nuclear facilities [3][4].

This time, the objectives were fundamentally different. The opening salvo killed Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's 86-year-old supreme leader since 1989, along with Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh and Revolutionary Guards commander Mohammed Pakpour in their Tehran compounds [2][4]. Israel and the United States struck more than 5,000 targets in the first days, according to US Central Command [4].

Iran's retaliation has been sweeping. Tehran launched hundreds of ballistic missiles and drones not only at Israel but at US military installations across the Gulf — hitting targets in Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey [4]. At least 12 people have been killed in Israel and more than 1,300 in Iran, including 168 victims in a strike on the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls' school in Minab [4][9].

Perhaps most consequentially for the global economy, Iran has moved to close the Strait of Hormuz — the narrow waterway through which approximately 20% of the world's petroleum supply transits daily [5]. Tanker traffic through the strait dropped by roughly 70% in the first days, then essentially ceased as shippers refused to risk attacks [5].

Source: FRED / U.S. Energy Information Administration

Data as of Mar 4, 2026CSV

The Pope's Escalating Warnings

Pope Leo XIV's response to the crisis has been swift and increasingly forceful. During his Angelus prayer on March 1 — barely 48 hours after the strikes began — the pope said he was "following with profound concern" the events unfolding in the Middle East and warned of a potential "tragedy of enormous proportions" [2].

His language has only sharpened since. "Stability and peace are not built through mutual threats, nor with weapons that sow destruction, suffering, and death, but only through reasonable, authentic, and responsible dialogue," the pope declared [2][6]. He issued "a heartfelt appeal to all the parties involved to assume the moral responsibility of halting the spiral of violence before it becomes an irreparable abyss" [2].

By March 8, with the bombing now in its second week, Pope Leo XIV called for "the thunderous sound of bombs" to stop, voicing particular concern that the conflict was already spilling into Lebanon and risked destabilizing the broader region [8]. He also pointedly noted that the "daily suffering of people, especially in Gaza and other territories, risks falling into oblivion" as the world's attention shifted to the new front [3].

The Pope's words carry particular weight given that his predecessor, Pope Francis, had invested heavily in dialogue with the Islamic world — including a telephone conversation with Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi on November 5, 2023, regarding the Gaza crisis, and the historic 2021 meeting with Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani in Najaf, Iraq [9][10].

The Vatican's Sharpest Critique in Decades

While the pope's public appeals have been carefully calibrated, his top diplomat has delivered what may be the Vatican's most pointed critique of American military policy since the 2003 Iraq War.

In a March 4 interview with Vatican media, Cardinal Pietro Parolin — the Holy See's Secretary of State and, effectively, its foreign minister — warned that if states were to claim a right to "preventive war" according to their own criteria and without a supranational legal framework, "the whole world would risk being set ablaze" [11][12].

Parolin's language was strikingly direct. "This erosion of international law is truly worrying: justice has given way to force; the force of law has been replaced by the law of force, with the conviction that peace can arise only after the enemy has been annihilated," he said [11]. The cardinal questioned whether anyone "truly believes that the solution can come through the launching of missiles and bombs" — a statement that, while not naming the United States directly, left little ambiguity about its target [12].

The critique echoed the Vatican's opposition to the 2003 Iraq invasion but went further, situating the current conflict within what Parolin described as a broader erosion of the post-World War II international order — a system built on principles of self-determination, territorial sovereignty, and the resolution of disputes through multilateral institutions rather than unilateral force [11].

A Hidden History: The Vatican and Shia Islam

The Damad letter and the Vatican's response have illuminated a decades-long diplomatic relationship that few outside specialist circles know exists. As theologian and journalist Antonio Spadaro detailed in a March 8 analysis, the Holy See has pursued a "long, patient path" of engagement with Iran and the broader Shia world — "woven from encounters, carefully measured words, and prophetic gestures" [9].

Key milestones include Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran's 2010 visit to Tehran, carrying papal correspondence expressing openness to collaboration on ethical questions and peace initiatives [9]. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani's 2016 visit to the Vatican represented a reciprocal recognition that exceeded mere diplomatic protocol [9]. And Pope Francis's 2021 meeting with Ayatollah al-Sistani in Najaf was described by participants as "one of the historic turning points of the divine religions" [9].

This history of engagement has not, however, prevented the Vatican from criticizing Iran. The Holy See has expressed "deep concern" over Tehran's crackdown on protesters, particularly during the 2022 "Woman, Life, Freedom" movement and subsequent waves of unrest [10]. The relationship has always been one of candid dialogue rather than uncritical alliance.

What makes the current moment remarkable is how this quiet diplomacy has suddenly been thrust center stage. With formal diplomatic channels between the warring parties all but severed, religious and moral authority has become one of the few remaining avenues for mediation.

Source: GDELT Project

Data as of Mar 11, 2026CSV

Oil Markets and the Global Fallout

The war's economic reverberations have been immediate and severe. Brent crude, which had been trading near $70 per barrel before the strikes, surged past $100 within days of the Strait of Hormuz closure, climbing as high as $119.50 at one point before pulling back amid volatile trading [5][13].

WTI crude oil showed a sharp spike from roughly $67 on February 27 to $71 on March 2 — numbers that reflect only the earliest phase of the crisis before the FRED data series was last updated [14]. Market analysts at multiple firms have warned that a prolonged closure of the strait could push prices significantly higher, with some forecasting $130-$150 per barrel if the blockade persists [13].

The price volatility has been extreme. On March 10, Brent plunged 17% to fall below $80 after President Trump suggested the war would end "very soon," then rebounded to near $90 after the US Secretary of Energy briefly and erroneously claimed the Navy had escorted a tanker through the Strait [13]. These wild swings reflect a market that has no confident picture of how or when the conflict will end.

Over 150 ships have anchored outside the strait to avoid risk, effectively creating a floating parking lot of stranded petroleum [5]. The disruption affects not just oil but also liquefied natural gas shipments from Qatar, the world's largest LNG exporter, with implications for energy prices in Europe and Asia.

Two Cardinals Break Ranks

In a remarkable sign of internal division within the American Catholic Church, two US cardinals have publicly rejected the US-Israeli war in Iran even as the pope has sought to maintain diplomatic balance [3]. While the Vatican has not named the United States in its criticisms, the cardinals' statements — reported by ABC News — represent a more explicit break with American policy, suggesting that the pope's carefully worded appeals are backed by deeper institutional opposition within the Church [3].

The Question of What Comes Next

Eleven days into the conflict, the situation remains extraordinarily fluid. Iran continues to launch retaliatory strikes across multiple countries. The Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed. Casualty figures are rising. And diplomatic channels between the principal combatants appear limited at best.

The Vatican's role — amplified by Damad's letter — has emerged as one of the few consistent voices calling for restraint. But the Holy See's influence is moral rather than coercive, and the gap between papal appeals and the calculus of warring governments has historically been vast. Pope John Paul II's passionate opposition to the 2003 Iraq invasion did not stop that war, and there is little reason to expect Pope Leo XIV's words alone will halt this one.

What the Damad letter and the Vatican's response do reveal, however, is the existence of a quiet infrastructure of interfaith dialogue that predates and transcends the current crisis — a network of relationships between Shia scholars and Catholic leaders that has been built painstakingly over decades. Whether that infrastructure can bear the weight now being placed upon it — as a genuine channel for de-escalation rather than merely a forum for moral protest — may be one of the most consequential questions of this conflict.

Cardinal Parolin's warning resonates beyond the immediate crisis: "If states claim the right to launch preventive wars according to their own criteria, the entire world risks being set ablaze" [11]. As the bombs continue to fall on Tehran and missiles continue to arc toward Israel, the question is not whether the Vatican's moral authority matters — it is whether anyone with the power to stop the fighting is listening.