Canada Sheds 84,000 Jobs as Unemployment Rate Climbs to 6.7%

Canada's labor market suffered its worst monthly decline in years outside of pandemic-era disruptions when the economy shed 84,000 jobs in February 2026, pushing the unemployment rate to 6.7% [1]. The losses, concentrated in full-time positions and the private sector, caught economists off guard — a Reuters poll had predicted a gain of 10,000 jobs [2]. Coming on the heels of 25,000 jobs lost in January, the back-to-back declines have raised urgent questions about whether Canada's economy is entering a more serious downturn, driven by the compounding pressures of U.S. tariff uncertainty, high interest rates, and a population surge that has outpaced job creation.

The Numbers: A Full-Time, Private-Sector Rout

The headline figure of 84,000 jobs understates the severity in some respects. Full-time employment fell by 108,000 positions, partially offset by a rise in part-time work [1]. Private sector employment dropped by 73,000, while the public sector and self-employment were largely unchanged [1]. The employment rate — the share of the working-age population with a job — fell to 60.6%, down 0.2 percentage points [1].

"This was a very bad report on almost every single measure," said Katherine Judge, Senior Economist at CIBC Capital Markets [2]. Douglas Porter, Chief Economist at Bank of Montreal, put it more bluntly: "We've seen almost no job growth whatsoever over the last 12 months" [3].

Source: FRED / Statistics Canada

Data as of Mar 24, 2026CSV

Where the Jobs Disappeared: Industry and Provincial Breakdown

The losses were broad-based, spanning both goods-producing and services-producing sectors. Services-producing industries lost 56,000 positions while goods-producing industries shed 28,000 [1].

The hardest-hit sectors included:

• Wholesale and retail trade: -18,000 (-0.6%)
• Other services: -14,000 (-1.8%)
• Construction: -12,000 (-0.7%)
• Manufacturing: -9,200 (-0.5%) [1]

Only three sectors reported job gains: transportation, warehousing, and public administration [2].

Geographically, the losses were heavily concentrated. Quebec bore the brunt, losing 57,000 jobs (-1.2%) — the province's first significant employment decline in over four years [1]. British Columbia shed 20,000 positions (-0.7%), Saskatchewan lost 5,500 (-0.9%), and Manitoba lost 4,000 (-0.5%). Ontario's employment was essentially flat, though the province already carried the highest unemployment rate among major provinces at 7.6% [1]. Newfoundland and Labrador was the lone province to add jobs, gaining 2,100 [1].

The scale of Quebec's losses is notable and warrants scrutiny. A single-month decline of 57,000 jobs in a province of roughly 4.7 million workers is statistically unusual and may reflect seasonal adjustment volatility as much as genuine economic weakness — a caveat that applies to any single month of Labour Force Survey data.

Who Lost Their Jobs: Youth and Core-Aged Men Hit Hardest

The demographic breakdown reveals a labor market that is punishing younger and male workers disproportionately. Youth aged 15 to 24 lost 47,000 jobs in February alone, pushing their unemployment rate up 1.3 percentage points to 14.1% [1]. That figure is approaching the September 2025 peak of 14.7%, which was the highest youth unemployment rate since 2010, excluding the pandemic years [4].

Among racialized youth, the disparities are stark. Black youth face an unemployment rate of 23.2%, up 4.6 percentage points year-over-year. Chinese youth stand at 17.4%, South Asian youth at 13.0%, compared to 11.2% for non-racialized, non-Indigenous youth [1].

Core-aged men (25 to 54) lost 41,000 jobs, with their unemployment rate rising to 5.7% [1]. Core-aged women's employment was little changed, with their unemployment rate holding at 5.8% [1]. Workers 55 and older actually saw their unemployment rate dip slightly, to 4.9% [1].

Source: Statistics Canada Labour Force Survey

Data as of Mar 13, 2026CSV

The Tariff Shadow: How U.S. Trade Policy Is Chilling Hiring

The elephant in the room for Canada's labor market is the ongoing trade conflict with the United States. In March 2025, the U.S. imposed 25% tariffs on Canadian exports and 10% tariffs on Canadian energy, prompting retaliatory counter-tariffs from Ottawa on $155 billion worth of products [5]. While some tariffs have been paused or renegotiated since, the pattern of on-again, off-again trade threats has created a pervasive uncertainty that businesses cite as a primary reason for freezing hiring and investment.

CIBC's Judge noted that labor market weakness had previously been confined to manufacturing sectors directly exposed to U.S. tariffs, but "only three sectors reporting job gains last month... those cracks are spreading" [2]. Andrew Hencic, Senior Economist at TD Bank, described the data as a "decidedly weak report" and identified "ongoing trade uncertainty" as a structural challenge [2].

The Conference Board of Canada has warned that tariff uncertainty alone — even without tariffs being permanently applied — is sufficient to slow economic growth because businesses delay capital expenditures and hiring when they cannot predict input costs [6]. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle: uncertainty reduces investment, which reduces hiring, which reduces consumer spending, which further dampens business confidence.

Monetary Policy: Did the Bank of Canada Engineer This?

The Bank of Canada spent much of 2023 and 2024 holding interest rates at elevated levels specifically to cool an overheated economy and bring inflation back to its 2% target. To some degree, a softening labor market was the intended mechanism. Higher borrowing costs reduce business expansion and consumer spending, which slows hiring, which restrains wage growth, which tames inflation.

By that logic, the rise in unemployment from a low of around 5.0% in early 2023 to 6.7% today is partly a feature, not a bug, of the Bank's strategy [7]. The central bank began cutting rates in mid-2024, eventually bringing the policy rate down from 5.0% to 2.25% by December 2025 through a series of reductions [8]. But the lag effects of monetary policy — typically estimated at 12 to 18 months — mean that the full impact of the earlier rate hikes may still be working through the economy.

The question now is whether the Bank has achieved a "soft landing" — bringing inflation under control without triggering a recession — or whether the labor market is weakening beyond what policymakers intended. With wage growth still running at 3.9% year-over-year in February [1], the Bank faces a dilemma: cut rates further to support jobs and risk reigniting inflation, or hold steady and risk a deeper employment downturn.

Judge at CIBC said the report is "very worrisome for the Bank of Canada" but forecast the central bank should remain on hold for the remainder of the year [2]. Porter at BMO struck a different note, suggesting the Bank should "consider rate cuts if weakness continues" [3].

The Immigration Factor: Supply Outrunning Demand

Canada admitted approximately 1.3 million new permanent residents across 2022 and 2023, and the country's population grew at its fastest pace in 40 years, largely driven by immigration and a surge in temporary residents [9]. This population boom increased the labor supply significantly — but the economy did not create jobs at a matching pace.

The employment rate declined to 61.3% in 2024, down from 62.2% in 2023, and remained below the pre-pandemic level of 62.3% [10]. For recent permanent immigrants, the unemployment rate jumped from 8.0% in 2023 to 9.9% in 2024 [9]. A Bank of Canada staff discussion paper published in May 2025 identified rapid population growth, particularly through immigration, as one of the factors driving higher unemployment among both youth and newcomers [4].

This is not a simple story of immigrants "taking jobs." Rather, the labor supply expanded at a time when the economy was slowing due to high interest rates and trade uncertainty. The result is that both newcomers and Canadian-born workers face a more competitive job market. Immigrants accounted for 28.9% of the national labor force in 2023 [9], and their participation rate is actually higher than that of established residents [10]. The federal government has since announced plans to reduce immigration targets, but the effects of the 2022-2024 surge on the labor supply will take years to fully absorb.

The Safety Net: Employment Insurance Under Strain

For the 1.5 million Canadians currently unemployed, the adequacy of the Employment Insurance system has become a pressing concern. According to the Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP), in July 2025, only 606,000 of the 1.65 million unemployed Canadians received regular EI benefits — meaning nearly two-thirds fell through the safety net [11].

The beneficiaries-to-unemployed (BU) ratio has fallen to 35%, one of its lowest points in recent history outside the pandemic [11]. This is a dramatic decline from the pre-1990s era when the ratio was closer to 75% [11]. Coverage is consistently lowest for workers aged 15 to 24 — the same group bearing the heaviest job losses [11].

Long-term unemployment is also climbing. As of February 2026, 22.8% of all unemployed Canadians had been searching for work for 27 weeks or longer, up from a pre-pandemic average of 17.1% [1]. Supplementary unemployment rates tracking those jobless for more than three months and more than a year nearly doubled between March 2023 and 2025 [11].

In response, the federal government has extended temporary EI measures, including 20 additional weeks of benefits for long-tenured workers (up to a maximum of 65 weeks) and a waiver of the one-week waiting period for claims established between March 2025 and October 2026 [12].

International Context: Canada's Gap With the U.S. Is Widening

Source: FRED / BLS / Statistics Canada

Data as of Mar 24, 2026CSV

When adjusted to U.S. concepts for comparability, Canada's unemployment rate stood at 5.6% in February — still above the U.S. rate of 4.4% [1]. Using domestic measures, the gap is wider: Canada at 6.7% versus the U.S. at 4.4% [13].

Among G7 nations in Q3 2025, Germany had the lowest unemployment at 3.8%, followed by the United States at 4.3%, the United Kingdom at 5.0%, and France at the highest at 7.7% [14]. Canada's 6.7% places it in the upper range of G7 unemployment rates, and the gap with the U.S. has widened over the past two years — a reversal from the pre-pandemic period when the two countries' rates tracked more closely.

What Comes Next: Forecasts and Risks

Most economists expect Canada's labor market to stabilize later in 2026 but not before further softening. RBC Economics projects the unemployment rate may climb above 7% in the first half of 2026 before declining in the second half as economic growth firms and population growth slows [15]. BMO's economic outlook projects GDP growth of roughly 1.4% for 2026 — below the long-run trend but not recessionary [16].

The expected pattern is what analysts describe as a "low-hire, low-fire" equilibrium: businesses are not launching mass layoffs, but they are also not filling positions, leading to a gradual erosion of employment through attrition and reduced turnover [15]. Job vacancies have fallen to an eight-year low, particularly in technology and retail [17].

The tariff dynamic remains the dominant wildcard. If U.S.-Canada trade tensions escalate further, manufacturing-dependent provinces like Ontario could face additional pressure. If tensions de-escalate, the pent-up business investment that has been deferred could provide a meaningful boost to hiring.

TD's Hencic also flagged the Middle East conflict as an economic wildcard, potentially affecting inflation through energy cost volatility [2]. With crude oil prices uncertain and the Canadian dollar under pressure, the Bank of Canada faces a constrained set of options.

Structural Questions With No Easy Answers

February's job report is a single data point, and month-to-month volatility in the Labour Force Survey can be significant — the survey has a margin of error of approximately 40,000 jobs at the national level. But the report does not exist in isolation. It follows months of weakening employment data, a sustained rise in unemployment from pandemic-era lows, and a business environment defined by uncertainty.

The structural questions are harder than the cyclical ones. Can Canada's economy absorb the population growth of recent years while simultaneously navigating a trade conflict with its largest trading partner? Can the Bank of Canada thread the needle between inflation control and employment support? And can the Employment Insurance system, designed for a different era, adequately protect the workers bearing the costs of these macroeconomic forces?

The answers will shape not only the labor market data in coming months but the economic trajectory of the country for years to come.