Senate GOP Proposes Deal to End DHS Shutdown as Trump Withholds Support

The Department of Homeland Security has been unfunded since February 14, 2026 — 39 days and counting. More than 100,000 DHS employees have missed full paychecks [1]. TSA officers are quitting at unprecedented rates, airport security lines have stretched past three hours at some hubs, and economists estimate the shutdown has already cost the U.S. economy upward of $2.5 billion [2]. Senate Republicans now say they have a deal framework to reopen the department. Whether it can survive President Trump's mercurial negotiating posture and Democratic demands for immigration enforcement reform is an open question.

How It Started: The Killing of Alex Pretti

The shutdown traces directly to January 24, 2026, when two U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers shot and killed Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old intensive care nurse at the Department of Veterans Affairs, in Minneapolis, Minnesota [3]. The killing — and a second fatal shooting by CBP agents in the same city — provoked an immediate political crisis. Senate Democrats, who had been negotiating the fiscal year 2026 DHS appropriations bill, announced they would no longer vote for funding without new guardrails on immigration enforcement [4].

Democrats outlined specific reform demands: restrictions on roving patrols, tighter parameters for search and arrest warrants, stronger use-of-force policies, mandatory body cameras for ICE agents, and a requirement that agents remove masks during operations [4]. Republicans rejected most of these conditions as overreach.

Congress managed a brief four-day continuing resolution in early February, but talks on substantive reforms collapsed by the February 13 deadline. When no agreement materialized, DHS funding lapsed at midnight on February 14, beginning the current partial shutdown — the second funding gap of 2026 and the longest single-agency shutdown in modern history [3].

Who Is Affected — and Who Isn't

The shutdown's impact varies sharply across DHS's component agencies because of an unusual wrinkle: the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA), a reconciliation package Trump signed in July 2025, pre-funded large portions of DHS operations with roughly $180 billion allocated for specific purposes including border protection and disaster relief [5].

Funded through OBBBA:

• Nearly 58,000 Customs and Border Protection employees, including Border Patrol agents and CBP officers, continue to receive pay [1].
• ICE agents conducting enforcement and removal operations have continued operating with funds from the reconciliation bill, which added $75 billion to ICE's budget [6].
• U.S. Secret Service protective details remain funded [1].

Working without pay:

• Approximately 54,000 Transportation Security Administration officers are classified as essential and must report to work — but have not received full paychecks since the shutdown began [7]. TSA workers missed their first complete paycheck on March 13 [7].
• Coast Guard personnel in non-OBBBA-funded roles face pay disruptions, with the service reporting reduced patrol schedules and gaps in fleet availability [8].
• FEMA operations outside of pre-funded disaster relief have slowed, with the disaster fund described as "near depletion" [8].

Furloughed:

• Approximately 8% of DHS's total workforce — roughly 20,000 employees — have been furloughed outright, including administrative staff, policy analysts, and non-essential personnel across multiple agencies [5].

Source: FRED / Bureau of Labor Statistics

Data as of Mar 25, 2026CSV

Airport Chaos: TSA by the Numbers

The most visible consequence of the shutdown has been at America's airports. TSA's nationwide callout rate — the percentage of scheduled officers who don't show up for work — has averaged 6% during the shutdown, triple the pre-shutdown baseline of about 2% [9]. On the worst days, the numbers have been far more severe:

• On March 14, Houston Hobby International Airport recorded a 55% callout rate, the highest single-day figure at any airport since the shutdown began [1].
• On March 21, the national callout rate hit 11.76%, with more than 3,200 scheduled officers missing work [10].
• At least 458 TSA officers have resigned since February 14, with the pace of departures accelerating as the shutdown enters its sixth week [10].

The staffing crisis has produced security wait times exceeding three hours at airports including Houston, Atlanta, Baltimore/Washington, and the New York-area airports of LaGuardia, JFK, and Newark [10]. The timing has been especially damaging: the shutdown has coincided with the spring break travel surge, one of the busiest periods in American aviation [9].

In an unusual step, the administration deployed ICE agents to assist with security screening at 13 airports, a move critics described as a stopgap measure that does not address the underlying workforce crisis [11].

The Senate GOP Deal: 94% of DHS, Zero Percent of ICE Removals

The framework Senate Republicans presented on March 22, refined through the weekend and into this week, would fund approximately 94% of the DHS budget while withholding $5.5 billion allocated for ICE's Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) — the division responsible for executing deportations [6].

Under the proposal:

• TSA, the Coast Guard, FEMA, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and most other DHS components would receive full fiscal year 2026 funding [6].
• ICE's Homeland Security Investigations division, which handles transnational crime and human trafficking, would be funded [10].
• CBP would receive its remaining appropriations beyond what OBBBA already covers [10].
• The bill would include funding for officer body cameras and a requirement for judicial approval of home search warrants — two of the less contentious Democratic reform demands [10].

The missing piece — ICE's ERO funding — would be addressed separately through a budget reconciliation package that Republicans could pass on a party-line vote without Democratic support [12]. That reconciliation vehicle would also carry the SAVE America Act, President Trump's priority voter ID legislation [12].

Senate Majority Leader John Thune expressed confidence on March 24 that the chamber could pass the DHS funding bill "by the end of the week," before the Senate recesses for a two-week Easter break on Friday [6].

Trump's 48-Hour Reversal

The deal nearly died before it reached the Senate floor. On Monday morning, March 23, Trump posted on Truth Social that the SAVE America Act was "the most important issue in the Senate" and declared he would not sign any legislation until the voter ID bill passed [13]. He called on senators to stay through the Easter recess if necessary and demanded that DHS funding be directly linked to the SAVE Act [13].

The demand put Senate Republicans in an immediate bind. The SAVE America Act requires 60 votes to clear the Senate's filibuster threshold, and Majority Leader Thune acknowledged plainly that the votes were not there [14]. Linking the two bills would have guaranteed the shutdown's continuation through at least the two-week recess — and potentially far longer.

By Monday evening, however, Trump's position shifted. After conversations between White House officials and Senate leadership, a White House official told reporters that the deal framework "seems to be acceptable" [15]. The apparent reversal, accomplished in roughly 12 hours, reflected what multiple news outlets described as Trump's recognition that the airport chaos and mounting economic costs were becoming a political liability for Republicans heading into 2026 midterm positioning [14].

Trump's stated rationale for initially opposing the deal centered on his belief that Democrats should be forced to accept the SAVE America Act as the price of reopening DHS [13]. The Act would require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship when registering and present government-issued photo identification at the polls. It would also mandate that every state submit its voter registration rolls to DHS for comparison against federal immigration databases [16].

Democratic Objections: Not Enough Reform

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer rejected the initial GOP proposal on March 24, saying it "does not have any reforms" sufficient to address the concerns that triggered the shutdown [6]. Democrats have continued to push for structural changes to ICE's enforcement practices — particularly restrictions that would limit the agency's authority to conduct operations far from the border [17].

The Democratic position has drawn on public outrage following the Pretti shooting and a second fatal encounter in Minneapolis to argue that ICE and CBP require binding operational constraints, not just body cameras [4]. Specific demands have included limitations on roving immigration patrols in interior cities, stricter warrant requirements, and enhanced oversight mechanisms [4].

Republicans and the White House have characterized these demands as an attempt to gut enforcement capabilities that Trump campaigned on and that form a centerpiece of his administration's immigration agenda [18]. The newly confirmed DHS Secretary, Markwayne Mullin — who replaced Kristi Noem after Trump fired her in the wake of the Minneapolis shootings — was confirmed on a 54-45 vote on March 23 [19]. Mullin has signaled willingness to negotiate on body cameras but has resisted broader operational restrictions [10].

Historical Context: A Shutdown Without Precedent

The 2026 DHS shutdown is unusual in several respects. While government shutdowns have become a recurring feature of American fiscal politics — the 2018-2019 shutdown lasted 35 days, and the 2025 shutdown under Trump lasted 43 days [3] — a shutdown affecting only a single cabinet department for this duration is rare.

The closest parallel is the 2015 DHS funding standoff, when congressional Republicans attempted to use the department's appropriations bill to block President Obama's executive actions on immigration. That crisis was resolved after a week-long funding lapse through a clean continuing resolution [3].

The current situation is also structurally unusual because the president's own party controls both chambers of Congress yet has been unable to fund a department the president ostensibly prioritizes. Trump's shifting demands — first insisting on linking DHS funding to the SAVE Act, then appearing to back away — have complicated the GOP caucus's ability to present a unified position [14].

The Economic Toll

Economists have estimated that the shutdown has already cost the U.S. economy more than $2.5 billion, with losses concentrated in the travel, tourism, and shipping sectors [2]. The ripple effects extend beyond the immediate disruption at airports:

• The Coast Guard's reduced patrol schedule has affected maritime shipping credentialing, with the service reportedly halting new credential issuances for merchant mariners [8].
• FEMA's diminished capacity to process non-disaster claims has created backlogs in communities still recovering from previous natural disasters [8].
• Federal contractors who provide services to DHS agencies face payment delays, with smaller firms reporting cash-flow crises [2].
• Delta Air Lines suspended its congressional specialty services during the shutdown, a largely symbolic but publicly visible consequence [10].

Source: FRED / Bureau of Labor Statistics

Data as of Mar 25, 2026CSV

What Comes Next

The immediate timeline is compressed. The Senate is scheduled to recess on Friday, March 27, for a two-week Easter break. If no deal passes before then, the shutdown will extend to at least 53 days — well past the previous record for a single-agency funding lapse [6].

Several scenarios remain in play:

Scenario 1: The Thune deal passes this week. If Democrats accept the 94% funding bill with modest reforms (body cameras, warrant requirements), the Senate could vote before Friday. The House, where Republicans hold a narrow majority, would need to pass a matching bill. Trump has signaled he would sign it [15].

Scenario 2: Democrats hold out for stronger reforms. Schumer's rejection of the initial offer suggests Democrats may push for more concessions. If talks stall, the Senate leaves for recess with DHS still unfunded [17].

Scenario 3: Trump reverses again. The president's 12-hour pivot on the SAVE Act raised questions about the durability of his support. Another Truth Social post could upend negotiations at any point [14].

Scenario 4: A veto. If Congress passes a bill Trump opposes, he retains veto authority. Overriding a veto requires two-thirds majorities in both chambers — 67 votes in the Senate and 290 in the House — thresholds that appear out of reach given current partisan divisions [14].

The legal landscape also contains a wild card. Constitutional scholars have debated whether the Antideficiency Act, which governs federal spending during lapses, could be challenged if essential services deteriorate to the point of endangering public safety [5]. No such challenge has been filed, but the length and specificity of this shutdown — affecting the department most directly responsible for domestic security — has prompted renewed academic discussion.

The Broader Stakes

Beyond the immediate question of paychecks and airport lines, the DHS shutdown has exposed a structural tension in American governance. The department created after September 11, 2001 to consolidate domestic security functions now finds itself hostage to disputes over immigration enforcement, voter ID laws, and intra-party negotiations between a Republican president and Republican congressional leaders who cannot agree on priorities.

For the more than 100,000 DHS employees working without pay or sitting at home on furlough, the policy debate is secondary to a more immediate concern. As one TSA officer at Houston's Hobby Airport told reporters: the question isn't about the SAVE Act or ICE reform. The question is whether the mortgage gets paid this month [7].

This article reflects information available as of March 25, 2026. The Senate is expected to vote on a DHS funding proposal before its scheduled recess on March 27.