Scientists Identify Mysterious 'Golden Orb' Found on Deep Ocean Floor in 2023

On August 30, 2023, during the seventh dive of a routine NOAA mapping expedition in the Gulf of Alaska, the remotely operated vehicle Deep Discoverer spotted something no one on the ship could explain: a smooth, golden, dome-shaped object, roughly four inches across, with a small tear near its base, stuck firmly to a rock at a depth of 3,250 meters — more than two miles below the surface [1][2].

"Everyone was like, 'What the heck? What is that?'" one researcher recalled [3].

The object was collected using a suction sampler and sent to the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of Natural History. It would take two and a half years, multiple failed DNA tests, and a full genome-sequencing effort before scientists could say what it was. The answer, published as a preprint on bioRxiv on April 17, 2026, is both stranger and more ordinary than the speculation that surrounded it: the golden orb is the leftover basal structure — the anchoring foot — of Relicanthus daphneae, a giant deep-sea anemone that can stretch its tentacles up to seven feet [4][5].

The Discovery: Seascape Alaska 5

The golden orb was found during Seascape Alaska 5 (expedition designation EX2306), the fifth in a series of six telepresence-enabled expeditions NOAA conducted off Alaska in 2023 [6]. The expedition departed Kodiak, Alaska on August 23 and concluded in Seward on September 16 — a 23-day campaign during which the team completed 19 ROV dives at depths ranging from 253 to 4,262 meters and mapped 28,287 square kilometers of seafloor [6].

The expedition was conducted aboard the NOAA Ship Okeanos Explorer, the agency's only vessel dedicated solely to ocean exploration, using the ROV Deep Discoverer [1][2]. NOAA Ocean Exploration, the program that funds and operates these missions, spent over 160 days at sea aboard the Okeanos Explorer in 2023 [6]. Specific budget figures for individual expeditions are not publicly disclosed, though the broader NOAA Ocean Exploration program operates under annual congressional appropriations.

The orb was found adhered to a rocky outcropping on the seafloor of the Gulf of Alaska. At 3,250 meters, the site sits within the bathypelagic zone — a region of perpetual darkness, near-freezing temperatures, and immense pressure where biological surveys remain exceptionally sparse.

The Long Road to Identification

From the moment the specimen arrived at the Smithsonian, the identification process proved difficult. Scientists initially considered several hypotheses: Was it an egg casing? A dead sponge? A coral fragment? Had something crawled into it, or out of it [2][7]?

Physical examination revealed that the object consisted of fibrous material covered with stinging cells. Those cells were identified as spirocysts — specialized structures that can capture prey by firing adhesive threads. Spirocysts are exclusive to cnidarians, the phylum of aquatic invertebrates that includes jellyfish, corals, and anemones [5][8]. The spirocysts found in the golden orb were among the largest ever recorded in any cnidarian species [8].

But knowing the orb came from a cnidarian was only half the answer. The team attempted standard DNA barcoding — a method that sequences short, standardized gene regions to match an organism against a reference database. The results were inconclusive, likely because the degraded specimen had picked up DNA from other microscopic life on its surface [2][5].

The breakthrough came when the team turned to whole-genome sequencing, a more comprehensive and expensive technique that reads the entirety of an organism's genetic material. Allen Collins, director of NOAA Fisheries' National Systematics Laboratory, described the process as requiring "morphological, genetic, deep-sea and bioinformatics expertise to solve" [5][8].

The genome sequencing confirmed the presence of animal DNA and returned a strong match to Relicanthus daphneae. The identification was further strengthened by a second specimen collected during a separate dive in 2021, which proved "genetically almost identical" to the golden orb [8]. Mitochondrial genome analysis of both specimens showed near-identical sequences matching a known reference genome for the species [5].

What Is Relicanthus daphneae?

Relicanthus daphneae is a giant deep-sea anemone first observed in the 1970s but not formally described and classified until 2006 [5][9]. It is among the largest known anemone species: its pink-colored, cylindrical body can reach up to one meter (roughly three feet) across, and its pale, thread-like tentacles extend up to two meters (approximately 6.5 feet) [8][9].

The species was previously known primarily from the periphery of deep-sea hydrothermal vents — underwater hot springs where superheated, mineral-rich water escapes through cracks in the ocean crust. Life clusters around these vents in the otherwise food-scarce deep ocean, and R. daphneae uses its extraordinary tentacles to snag mobile prey passing through vent field edges [9][10].

Before this finding, the species had mainly been documented near hydrothermal vents in the Pacific, Southern, and Indian oceans, with the type specimen collected from the Lau Basin in the western Pacific by the submersible DSV Alvin [9]. The Gulf of Alaska is not a known hydrothermal vent region, which raises questions about the species' true range. As researchers have noted, the apparent association with vents may reflect a sampling bias: scientists visit vents far more often than other deep-ocean habitats [9].

What the golden orb actually represents, physically, is the cuticle — a thin, multilayered coating secreted by the outer tissues of the anemone to anchor itself to the seafloor substrate. Over time, these layers of adhesive material accumulate into a structure that can persist after the anemone itself dies or detaches [5][7]. Scientists still cannot determine what happened to the top portion of the anemone — whether it died in place or relocated [8].

A Preprint, Not a Peer-Reviewed Paper

The findings were published on April 17, 2026, on bioRxiv, a preprint server for biological sciences [4]. The study — titled "The Curious Case of the Golden Orb – Relict of Relicanthus daphneae (Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Hexacorallia), a deep sea anemone" — lists nine authors: Steven R. Auscavitch, Abigail Reft, Adena B. Collens, Christopher Mah, Merlin Best, Charlotte Benedict, Estefanía Rodríguez, Marymegan Daly, and Allen G. Collins [4].

This distinction matters. Preprints are not peer-reviewed. They are posted publicly so other scientists can evaluate the methods and conclusions before formal journal publication. The identification rests on whole-genome sequencing and morphological analysis — both well-established methods — but the study has not yet undergone the formal scrutiny of anonymous peer reviewers. The reliance on genome matching rather than, say, a living specimen or direct observation of the anemone in situ means the conclusion is probabilistic: the DNA strongly matches R. daphneae, but the golden orb itself is a remnant structure, not a complete organism [4][5].

Steve Auscavitch, a marine biologist at the Smithsonian and the study's lead author, acknowledged that thousands of uncatalogued deep-sea specimens remain unsequenced, suggesting many more identification puzzles lie ahead [5][11].

The Scale of What We Haven't Seen

The golden orb's two-and-a-half-year identification journey is not an anomaly — it is a symptom of how little is known about life in the deep ocean.

Source: Science Advances (2025)

Data as of May 7, 2025CSV

A 2025 study published in Science Advances analyzed data from 43,681 deep-sea dives conducted since 1958 and found that humans have directly observed just 0.001% of the deep seafloor [12]. While roughly 28.7% of the global ocean floor has been mapped using multibeam sonar — sound-based instruments that can chart topography from the surface — that mapping reveals terrain, not biology [12][13]. Three-quarters of the seafloor remains entirely unmapped by any method.

Source: NOAA Ocean Exploration

Data as of Jan 1, 2026CSV

The implications for species discovery are significant. Scientists estimate the ocean may harbor between 700,000 and one million species, of which roughly 240,000 have been formally described [13]. That leaves an estimated 760,000 species awaiting discovery, with approximately 2,000 new marine species formally accepted each year [13]. At that rate, cataloguing the ocean's biodiversity would take centuries — assuming the species in question survive long enough to be found.

Source: OpenAlex

Data as of Jan 1, 2026CSV

Research output in the field has been rising. Academic publications related to deep-sea anemones peaked at 823 papers in 2023, the year of the golden orb's discovery, up from 278 in 2011 [14]. But increased publication does not necessarily mean increased fieldwork; much of the growth reflects advances in genomics and bioinformatics that allow laboratory analysis of previously collected specimens.

The Mining Question

The golden orb was found in the Gulf of Alaska at 3,250 meters — a depth range that overlaps with areas now being considered for deep-sea mineral extraction.

In January 2026, NOAA published a final rule streamlining permit applications for hard mineral mining in international waters, allowing prospective applicants to apply for exploration licenses and commercial recovery permits simultaneously [15]. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has released a Request for Information for seabed mining across multiple areas of the Alaskan Outer Continental Shelf, covering approximately 114 million acres — an area larger than California — and targeting critical minerals and heavy mineral sands [16][17].

The proposed lease area includes depths exceeding four miles near the Aleutian Trench and the abyssal plains of the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea [16]. While commercial-scale deep-sea mining has not yet begun anywhere in the world, the regulatory groundwork is being laid in the same waters where the golden orb was collected.

No mining permits have been issued for the specific site of the golden orb's discovery. But the convergence of newly accelerated permitting timelines with the discovery of a poorly understood species raises a question that marine biologists have been asking for years: how can regulators assess the environmental impact of industrial activity on ecosystems they have barely begun to catalogue?

Indigenous communities in Alaska have raised concerns about the potential effects of seabed mining on marine ecosystems and traditional subsistence practices [17]. Deep-sea mining techniques — which involve scraping or vacuuming the seafloor to extract mineral-rich nodules and crusts — would destroy precisely the kind of hard substrate to which organisms like R. daphneae attach.

What the Orb Tells Us — and What It Doesn't

The identification of the golden orb resolves one mystery but opens others. If R. daphneae is present in the Gulf of Alaska, far from any known hydrothermal vent, it may indicate a broader geographic range for the species than previously recognized — or it may suggest the presence of undiscovered vent systems or chemosynthetic habitats in the region [9].

Captain William Mowitt, acting director of NOAA Ocean Exploration, framed the result in terms of technological capability: "I don't think that the discovery changes how we explore, but it highlights how advancing technologies, like DNA analysis, can expand our exploration tool kit" [7].

The finding has not, as of April 2026, triggered any formal regulatory action. No protected-area designations have been modified, and no environmental agency has publicly announced an investigation into the broader ecosystem at the discovery site. Whether the finding should prompt such action is a matter of debate. A single remnant structure from a known (if poorly understood) species does not, by itself, demonstrate the presence of a thriving ecosystem. But it does suggest that large, ecologically significant organisms inhabit these waters — organisms that would be invisible to sonar mapping and detectable only through the kind of direct visual survey that has reached 0.001% of the deep seafloor [12].

The golden orb sat on the ocean floor for an unknown period before Deep Discoverer's cameras found it. It was one object, on one rock, on one dive, in a region that spans millions of acres of unsurveyed seafloor. The question is not whether there are more specimens like it down there. The question is how many have already been destroyed, or will be, before anyone looks.