Scientists Forecast Next El Niño Could Be Among Strongest in Decades

Sea surface temperatures in the central equatorial Pacific are climbing fast. On May 14, 2026, NOAA's Climate Prediction Center upgraded the United States' official ENSO Alert Status to El Niño Watch, assigning an 82 percent probability of El Niño emerging between May and July and a 96 percent probability for the December–February peak window [1]. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) has gone further: its ensemble mean projects Niño 3.4 anomalies reaching +3.0°C by late 2026 — a figure that, if realized, would exceed every El Niño in the modern instrumental record [2][3].

The last time the Pacific ran this hot in model projections, the result was the 2015–16 Super El Niño, which peaked at +2.6°C and reshaped weather patterns across every continent. Before that, the 1997–98 event peaked at +2.4°C. Now, forecasters are weighing whether this event could surpass both — or whether the inherent uncertainty in long-range ENSO prediction demands caution before declaring records months in advance.

The Numbers Behind the Forecast

The Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) — a three-month running average of sea surface temperature anomalies in the Niño 3.4 region of the central equatorial Pacific — is the primary yardstick. NOAA classifies El Niño events by ONI thresholds: weak (+0.5 to +0.9°C), moderate (+1.0 to +1.4°C), strong (+1.5 to +1.9°C), and very strong (+2.0°C and above) [1]. The Australian Bureau of Meteorology uses a slightly higher onset threshold of +0.8°C, and since September 2025, calculates its indices relative to global tropical temperatures rather than absolute anomalies [4].

As of mid-May 2026, weekly Niño 3.4 anomalies had reached +0.9°C, crossing the El Niño threshold with unusual speed [1]. The IRI/CPC probabilistic forecast assigns a 98 percent likelihood to El Niño during May–July 2026, with probabilities holding at 97–98 percent through the remainder of the year [5]. More critically, the CPC puts the chance of a strong or very strong event (ONI ≥ +1.5°C) at roughly 65 percent by October, with a "super" El Niño (≥ +2.0°C) identified as the single most likely outcome for the November 2026–January 2027 peak [1][6].

Source: NOAA Climate Prediction Center

Data as of Jun 1, 2026CSV

The ECMWF ensemble offers more granularity. Individual members range from about +1.7°C to +3.3°C for September predictions — a spread of 1.6°C that the agency itself describes as substantial [3]. The ensemble mean of +3.0°C sits well above the previous record of +2.6°C set during 2015–16, and would approach levels last seen during the catastrophic 1877–78 event, which coincided with devastating famines across Asia and South America [2][7].

How Reliable Are These Forecasts?

ENSO prediction at six-to-twelve-month lead times has improved substantially since the 1980s, but it faces a well-documented obstacle: the spring predictability barrier. Forecast skill drops markedly for predictions initiated in Northern Hemisphere spring, because this is when the Pacific's ENSO signal is weakest and background noise is strongest [8][9].

Measured by correlation coefficient (R), forecast skill for June conditions drops to roughly R ≈ 0.6 when predictions are issued in January, improves to R ≈ 0.75 from February, and reaches R ≈ 0.85 from March [8]. For forecasts issued in late-year months that must project across the spring barrier, correlations can fall below 0.3 for statistical models — limited practical utility [8]. The current forecasts, issued in May 2026, benefit from being on the far side of the barrier, with the Pacific already showing a clear warming trajectory. This timing strengthens confidence in the onset of El Niño, though the precise peak intensity remains uncertain.

The track record of "super El Niño" forecasts is mixed. In 2014, models widely predicted a strong El Niño that failed to materialize, with the event arriving a year later than forecast [10]. Research on the intrinsic predictability of strong El Niño events suggests an "irregular switching between an oscillatory state that has strong El Niño events and a chaotic state that lacks strong events," which can be triggered by weak seasonal forcing or noise [10]. A climate-network-based approach published in early 2026 did not produce concurring signals for a strong event this year, adding a dissenting note to the otherwise bullish consensus [11].

Source: OpenAlex

Data as of Jan 1, 2026CSV

Past Damage: Trillions, Not Billions

The economic toll of El Niño extends far beyond the event itself. A 2023 study in Nature Communications by Callahan and Mankin used a nonlinear climate-economy model to estimate that the 1982–83 and 1997–98 El Niño events reduced global income by $4.1 trillion and $5.7 trillion respectively over a five-year period [12]. The 2015–16 event was associated with $3.9 trillion in losses by the same methodology [12]. A separate study in Science found that El Niño events reduce global economic growth for years afterward, with tropical and developing countries bearing disproportionate costs [13].

Source: Nature Communications (Callahan & Mankin 2023)

Data as of Oct 1, 2023CSV

These figures dwarf the more commonly cited direct-disaster loss estimates (e.g., $4 billion in direct US losses from 1997–98), because they capture the cascading macroeconomic effects: agricultural failures, supply-chain disruptions, infrastructure damage, and lost productivity that compound over multiple years [12][13]. If the 2026–27 event reaches the intensities forecast by ECMWF, economic modeling suggests the cumulative costs could exceed any previous El Niño.

Who Gets Hit: Regional Impacts and Humanitarian Exposure

El Niño's impacts are geographically asymmetric. The canonical pattern brings drought to the western Pacific — Australia, Southeast Asia, parts of India — and above-average rainfall to South America's Pacific coast and the southern United States. A strong event amplifies these patterns, sometimes to extremes.

Horn of Africa and Southern Africa: Typically receive below-normal rainfall during El Niño's onset phase and above-normal rainfall later in the cycle. The region already faces chronic food insecurity, and a strong El Niño risks compounding existing crises [14].

Southeast Asia and Australia: Drought conditions are expected to reduce maize, rice, and wheat production [15]. Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has flagged the potential for significant rainfall deficits across the eastern half of the continent [4]. Indonesia and the Philippines face elevated wildfire risk and reduced agricultural output.

Latin America: The UN's FAO and WFP warned in 2026 that several million people in Central America's "Dry Corridor" could require additional food assistance, while South America's Pacific coast faces flooding risk from above-average precipitation [16][17]. The IFRC has begun pre-positioning supplies and activating forecast-based financing mechanisms [17].

Western United States: El Niño typically steers the jet stream southward, bringing above-average rainfall to California and the southern tier. During the 2015–16 event, this contributed to both beneficial reservoir recharge and destructive mudslides [6].

The WFP estimated that the 2023–24 El Niño contributed to a continued rise in acute food insecurity globally [16]. A stronger event in 2026–27 would compound existing pressures from conflict, high fertilizer costs, and disrupted maritime trade [15].

Climate Change, Natural Variability, and the Signal-to-Noise Problem

A central scientific question is whether the frequency or intensity of El Niño events is increasing because of anthropogenic warming — or whether observed changes reflect natural multidecadal variability.

The peer-reviewed evidence is nuanced. A 2023 study in Nature Climate Change found that "extreme El Niño and Central Pacific El Niño frequency" increased since 1980, with greenhouse-gas-driven warming causing faster warming of the eastern equatorial Pacific and a flattened thermocline that facilitates extreme events [18]. However, the same study noted that "internal variability also plays a role" and that "it is still unclear whether such change is externally forced or part of natural variability" [18].

The Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) — a pattern of multidecadal sea surface temperature variability across the North Pacific — modulates the expression of ENSO events. Research in Scientific Reports showed that when El Niño and the PDO are in phase, ENSO-induced precipitation and drought patterns are magnified; when out of phase, they weaken or disappear [19]. The PDO has been in a predominantly positive phase since around 2014, which could be amplifying the current El Niño's development — but this remains an area of active research.

The WMO's official position reflects this ambiguity: "There is no evidence that climate change increases the frequency or intensity of El Niño events, but it can amplify associated impacts because a warmer ocean and atmosphere increases the availability of energy and moisture for extreme weather" [20]. This distinction — between El Niño itself and El Niño's consequences — is central to accurate public communication.

The Case for Caution in Communication

Some atmospheric scientists have raised concerns about the framing of this El Niño as potentially "record-breaking" months before peak intensity. The argument is not that the forecast is wrong, but that emphasizing worst-case scenarios conflates natural variability with long-term climate trends and risks eroding public trust if the event underperforms.

This concern has precedent. The widely publicized 2014 Super El Niño forecast — which failed to materialize on schedule — contributed to "cry wolf" fatigue among policymakers and the public [10]. Research on strong El Niño predictability suggests that their development involves an inherent stochastic component: westerly wind bursts in the western Pacific can either accelerate or stall the warming process, and their timing is not predictable months in advance [10][21].

The concern about conflation is specific: El Niño is a mode of natural variability that has occurred for millennia. While a warmer baseline ocean temperature means any El Niño now sits atop higher absolute temperatures — producing more extreme weather impacts — this is distinct from saying that climate change is causing stronger El Niños. Mixing these messages, critics argue, hands ammunition to those who dismiss climate science altogether when a predicted extreme event fails to meet its billing.

Against this, proponents of strong public warnings argue that the cost of under-preparation far exceeds the cost of over-warning. The 2023–24 El Niño, which was moderate in intensity, still caught several countries underprepared [17]. With a genuinely strong event now likely, the scientific consensus favors early, clear communication — even with acknowledged uncertainty ranges.

The ECMWF addressed this directly in a May 2026 blog post, noting that the ensemble spread of +1.7°C to +3.3°C represents genuine uncertainty: "a more precise value cannot be reliably given" at this lead time [3].

Preparedness: Progress and Gaps

The international early-warning-to-action pipeline has improved since 2015–16. During the 2023–24 El Niño, anticipatory actions in nine Latin American countries reached more than 100,000 people in 250 rural communities, and in some Central American countries, these interventions increased maize and bean production by up to 40 percent [17].

Parametric insurance — which pays out automatically when a predefined climate threshold is crossed, rather than requiring damage assessment — has expanded in coverage, with new programs in the Caribbean, Pacific Islands, and parts of East Africa [22]. Digital financial services and mobile-phone-based early warning systems have widened the reach of preparedness messaging.

But significant gaps remain. Low-income countries in the most exposed regions often lack the fiscal space to pre-position food supplies, the infrastructure to distribute them, and the financial instruments to hedge against crop failure [22][14]. The UN's anticipatory action frameworks remain underfunded relative to estimated need. UNESCAP has emphasized that "advances in satellite data and analytics now allow near-real-time monitoring of soil moisture, vegetation health and water availability" — but translating this monitoring into household-level protective action requires institutional capacity that many governments do not have [22].

In high-income countries, the picture is different. The US agricultural insurance system, backed by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, provides extensive coverage for weather-related losses, and commodity traders have already begun pricing El Niño risk into futures markets [15]. Australia's insurance sector has absorbed El Niño-related bushfire and drought losses before, though premiums in fire-prone areas have risen sharply in recent years [4].

Timeline: From Here to Peak Impact

The progression from current conditions to peak El Niño follows a broadly predictable trajectory, even as the amplitude remains uncertain:

• May–July 2026: El Niño onset. Weekly Niño 3.4 anomalies have already crossed the +0.5°C threshold; the three-month ONI average is expected to follow. NOAA's current El Niño Watch would be upgraded to an El Niño Advisory upon official declaration [1].

• August–October 2026: Amplification phase. Sea surface temperature anomalies typically accelerate through boreal summer as the Bjerknes feedback (weakening trade winds → warmer surface waters → further weakening of trade winds) takes hold. The CPC assigns a 65 percent probability of strong or very strong intensity by October [1][6].

• November 2026–January 2027: Expected peak. This is the window when ONI values typically reach their maximum and when global weather impacts are most pronounced. NOAA, the Australian BoM, and the WMO would all have issued formal El Niño declarations well before this point [1][4][20].

• February–May 2027: Decay phase. El Niño events typically weaken through boreal spring, often transitioning to neutral or La Niña conditions by mid-year. However, economic and humanitarian impacts persist for years [12][13].

The WMO's formal declarations serve as triggers for anticipatory action by humanitarian agencies, national governments, and international organizations. The WMO's latest bulletin confirmed elevated probabilities and urged member states to activate climate-risk management plans [20]. NOAA's declarations trigger coordination among US federal agencies, including FEMA and the Department of Agriculture [1].

What Remains Unknown

The honest answer to many of the questions surrounding this El Niño is: it depends on what happens next. The Niño 3.4 region is warming rapidly, model agreement on El Niño onset is near-unanimous, and the probability of a strong-to-very-strong event is higher than at any comparable forecast lead time in recent memory.

But the difference between a strong El Niño (+1.5 to +1.9°C) and a record-shattering super event (+3.0°C) is enormous — in human, economic, and ecological terms. That gap will be narrowed not by models but by the atmosphere itself, over the coming months, as westerly wind bursts either sustain or fail to sustain the Pacific's warming trajectory. The scientific community is watching with better tools than ever before, but also with an awareness that ENSO retains an irreducible element of surprise.