ROTC Students Kill Active Shooter at Old Dominion University

On the morning of March 12, 2026, a convicted ISIS supporter walked into a classroom at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, and opened fire. What happened next — a group of unarmed ROTC cadets rushing and killing the gunman — has been called an act of extraordinary courage by federal officials. But the attack has also raised urgent questions about how a man sentenced to 11 years for terrorism-related offenses was free to carry out violence just 15 months after his early release from federal prison.

The Attack

At approximately 10:43 a.m. on Thursday, March 12, Mohamed Bailor Jalloh, 36, entered Constant Hall on the ODU campus — home to the university's College of Business — and made his way to a classroom [1]. According to multiple law enforcement sources, Jalloh asked whether it was an ROTC class. When someone confirmed it was, he shouted "Allahu Akbar" and opened fire [3].

The first target was the class instructor, Lt. Col. Brandon Shah, a retired Army officer and decorated combat aviator who had returned to his alma mater in the summer of 2022 to lead the Army ROTC Monarch Battalion [5]. Shah was shot multiple times and fatally wounded [2]. Two ROTC cadets were also struck by gunfire and injured [6].

Jalloh carried only one weapon. No explosives were found at the scene [7].

The ROTC Students' Response

What distinguishes the ODU shooting from many campus attacks is what happened in the seconds after the first shots were fired. Rather than fleeing, several ROTC cadets in the classroom physically confronted and subdued Jalloh before police could arrive on scene [8].

According to the FBI's Norfolk field office, the suspect died during the confrontation. Critically, investigators confirmed that Jalloh "was not shot by the students who intervened" — rather, one of the cadets stabbed the gunman, killing him [1][8]. The identities of the students who intervened have not been publicly released.

Dominique Evans, the FBI's special agent in charge in Norfolk, said the cadets showed "extreme bravery and courage" and that their actions "undoubtedly saved lives" [1]. FBI Director Kash Patel echoed that assessment, crediting the students with preventing what could have been a far deadlier attack [4].

The intervention unfolded in a matter of minutes. Law enforcement officers arrived on scene shortly after the shooting began and found the gunman already dead [2].

Lt. Col. Brandon Shah: A Life of Service

The sole fatality of the attack, Lt. Col. Brandon Shah, was a native of Staunton, Virginia, who had dedicated his career to military service and education [9].

Shah enlisted in the Army in 2003 as an aviation operations specialist. Over the course of his career, he earned his Senior Army Aviator wings and accumulated more than 1,200 flight hours across three aircraft types, including over 600 combat flight hours [9]. His individual awards included the Combat Action Badge, Parachutist Badge, and Air Assault Badge.

Shah first enrolled at ODU in 2005 and was commissioned in 2007, earning a bachelor's degree in sociology with a minor in military science. He later obtained an MBA from the University of Georgia and a master's in engineering management from the University of Kansas [9]. He returned to ODU in 2022 to lead the Monarch Battalion, where he was described as "an advocate for minority and veteran business education" who volunteered his time to support underserved communities [9].

His death was confirmed by Voorhees University, where Shah's father-in-law, Dr. Dan Martin, serves as a university trustee [5].

The Shooter: Mohamed Bailor Jalloh

The man behind the attack had a documented history of radicalization and a prior federal conviction for terrorism-related offenses.

Mohamed Bailor Jalloh was born in September 1989 in Sierra Leone and became a naturalized U.S. citizen [10]. He served in the Virginia National Guard from April 2009 to April 2015, reaching the rank of specialist in the 276th Engineer Battalion, 91st Troop Command, before receiving an honorable discharge [7].

During his time in the National Guard, Jalloh became radicalized after consuming lectures by Anwar al-Awlaki, the deceased al-Qaeda cleric whose online propaganda has inspired numerous domestic terror plots [10]. After leaving the Guard, Jalloh traveled to Africa, staying between July 2015 and January 2016 [10]. While in Nigeria, according to FBI investigators, he established contact with an ISIS operative.

Jalloh was arrested on July 3, 2016, after authorities said he attempted to procure weapons for what he believed would be an ISIS-inspired attack on U.S. soil and separately tried to send money to support the terror group [10]. In October 2016, he pleaded guilty to attempting to provide material support to ISIS, admitting in court that he had tried to "donate money to ISIL and commit a domestic attack in its name" [7].

At sentencing in February 2017, Jalloh expressed what appeared to be remorse, telling the judge: "This mistake of giving any support to the violent and extreme organization ISIS has been the most devastating one I have ever decided to make in my life" [10]. He received 11 years in prison plus five years of supervised release.

Early Release and Supervision Failure

Jalloh was released from federal prison in December 2024, roughly two years before the end of his full sentence, according to Federal Bureau of Prisons records [4]. Upon release, he was subject to five years of federal supervised release — a period of court-ordered monitoring that typically includes regular check-ins with a probation officer, restrictions on travel, and other conditions.

Just 15 months later, he carried out a targeted terrorist attack on a university campus.

The timeline has drawn intense scrutiny. How a convicted terrorism supporter — one who had admitted in court to plotting a domestic attack — was released early and subsequently able to acquire a weapon and plan an assault on an ROTC class is a question that federal authorities have yet to fully answer.

The shooting adds to a growing body of cases that have raised alarms about terrorism recidivism. A study by the University of Maryland's START center examined 561 post-9/11 terrorism offenders and found that of the 247 who had been released during the study period, four recidivated with terrorism-related activity [11]. While the overall rate remains low compared to general federal recidivism, the catastrophic potential of even a single case of terrorism recidivism has fueled calls for longer sentences and more intensive post-release monitoring.

The Terrorism Investigation

FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed that the bureau is investigating the ODU shooting "as an act of terrorism" [4]. The classification was swift — within hours of the incident, the FBI had publicly identified Jalloh and disclosed his prior conviction.

Investigators said Jalloh appeared to have deliberately targeted the ROTC class, asking specifically whether the classroom was hosting ROTC instruction before opening fire [1]. The deliberate nature of the target selection — military-affiliated students and a retired Army officer — combined with Jalloh's prior ISIS conviction and his reported exclamation, pointed clearly toward an ideologically motivated attack.

However, CBS News reported that investigators found no direct connection to current Middle East conflicts as a motivating factor [7], suggesting Jalloh may have been motivated by longstanding ideological commitments rather than any specific geopolitical trigger.

Campus Safety and the Broader Context

The ODU shooting is part of a persistent pattern of gun violence on American campuses. According to Everytown for Gun Safety, there have been at least 19 instances of gunfire on school grounds — from elementary schools to universities — since the start of 2026 [12]. The 2023-2024 academic year saw at least 144 incidents of gunfire on school grounds, a 31 percent increase from the prior year, resulting in 36 killed and 87 wounded [12].

Source: Everytown for Gun Safety

Data as of Mar 13, 2026CSV

At the same time, the ODU incident stands apart from typical campus shootings. It was not a case of interpersonal violence, a dispute that escalated, or a mental health crisis that turned deadly. It was, by the FBI's own determination, a premeditated act of terrorism carried out by a previously convicted offender — a category of campus violence that is exceedingly rare but uniquely difficult to prevent.

Political Fallout

Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger said she was "closely monitoring the on-campus shooting" and had spoken with university leadership, noting that "state support is being mobilized" [13]. Virginia Representative Bobby Scott called the incident a "violent tragedy" and thanked first responders who "neutralized the shooter before they could perpetrate any further violence" [13].

The attack is expected to fuel congressional debate on multiple fronts: the adequacy of federal supervision for released terrorism convicts, sentencing policies for material support offenses, and the broader question of campus security in an era of persistent gun violence.

The Aftermath

ODU canceled classes on its main campus for the remainder of March 12 and closed the university entirely on Friday, March 13 [2]. Counseling and support services were made available to students and staff.

The two injured ROTC cadets were transported to Sentara Norfolk General Hospital's Level I trauma center. One was listed in critical condition; a third person who sustained less severe injuries was treated and released from a separate emergency facility in Virginia Beach [6].

The names of the cadets who subdued and killed Jalloh have not been publicly released, and it remains unclear whether they will face any legal proceedings related to the gunman's death. In most jurisdictions, the use of lethal force to stop an active shooter is considered legally justifiable.

Unanswered Questions

As the FBI's investigation continues, several critical questions remain:

• How did Jalloh acquire the weapon used in the attack? As a convicted felon, he was prohibited from possessing firearms under federal law.
• What were the specific conditions of his supervised release, and were they being adequately enforced? Federal supervision records have not been made public.
• Did Jalloh act alone? Investigators have not yet confirmed whether he had accomplices or communicated with any extremist networks prior to the attack.
• Why was Jalloh released early? The Federal Bureau of Prisons has not publicly explained the basis for his release roughly two years before the end of his sentence.

The answers to these questions will likely shape policy discussions around terrorism sentencing, supervised release protocols, and the balance between rehabilitation and public safety for years to come. For the ODU community, the immediate reality is the loss of a beloved instructor and the trauma of an attack that unfolded in a place that should have been safe — and was made safer only by the extraordinary courage of the students inside that classroom.