Reality TV Star Spencer Pratt Polls Second in Los Angeles Mayoral Race

A reality TV star who lost his home in the Palisades Fire is now the incumbent mayor's closest competitor — and the numbers reveal a city in crisis, not a punchline.

The Numbers That Shook Los Angeles Politics

When Emerson College Polling and Inside California Politics released their March 2026 survey of the Los Angeles mayoral race, the top-line result landed like a seismic event in California politics: Spencer Pratt — the villain of MTV's The Hills, crystal-energy enthusiast, and self-described political outsider — had captured 10.2% of likely voter support, placing him firmly in second behind incumbent Mayor Karen Bass at 19.5% [1][2].

City Councilmember Nithya Raman followed at 9.3%, tech entrepreneur Adam Miller at 4.2%, and housing advocate Rae Huang at 2.9%. But the most telling number was the one that dwarfed them all: 50.9% of voters said they were undecided [1].

The poll, conducted March 7–9, 2026, surveyed 350 likely Los Angeles voters with a credibility interval of ±5.2 percentage points. Data was collected via MMS-to-web text, email, and online panels matched to voter files, then weighted by gender, age, and education based on U.S. Census parameters [3]. The tight margin between Pratt and Raman falls well within the margin of error. But the broader picture — an incumbent who cannot break 20% in her own reelection, with three-quarters of the electorate either undecided or already looking elsewhere — tells a story that transcends any single candidate.

Source: Emerson College Polling / Inside California Politics

Data as of Mar 9, 2026CSV

Who Is Voting for Spencer Pratt?

The Emerson crosstabs offer a revealing partisan portrait. Among registered Republicans in Los Angeles, Pratt commands 37% support — a dominant position in a city where Republicans are a distinct minority but where their consolidated support can punch above its weight in a fragmented primary field. Among Democrats, Bass leads at 27% with Raman at 14%, while 49% remain undecided. Independents are the most disengaged: 67% undecided, with no candidate breaking through [3].

Pratt, a registered Republican running as an independent, has built his support base through a social media apparatus of 1.2 million Instagram followers who have responded to his unfiltered critiques of Bass and California Governor Gavin Newsom [4]. His campaign has drawn public endorsements from The Hills co-star Brody Jenner, television personality Nick Viall, and DJ Kaskade, while Pratt himself claims private support from "studio and label executives and top filmmakers who decline public exposure" [5].

The demographic picture, while limited by small subsamples, suggests Pratt's coalition combines traditional Republican voters with fire-affected residents of the Westside and disaffected independents drawn to his outsider message. His announcement came at a Palisades Fire rally on January 7, 2026 — the one-year anniversary of the blaze that destroyed his family home and his parents' home where he grew up [6][7].

The Bass Record: What's Driving Dissatisfaction

Understanding Pratt's rise requires understanding the crater in Karen Bass's political standing. The same Emerson poll found Bass's job approval at just 24.4%, with 47.3% disapproving — a net negative of 22.9 points. A neutral bloc of 28.4% holds no opinion [8].

The collapse traces primarily to the January 2025 Palisades Fire and its aftermath, which became a cascading crisis of governance and trust:

The absence. Bass was in Ghana attending a presidential inauguration as part of the U.S. delegation when the fires erupted, returning to Los Angeles as the blazes intensified. The optics proved devastating for an executive whose core pitch was competent management [9].

The altered report. Internal records revealed that Bass asserted "ultimate authority" over LAFD media messaging following the fire. She has been accused of directing changes to an after-action review of the Palisades Fire response to soften language implicating the city's lack of preparedness, raising concerns about legal liability. Bass denied altering the original draft, saying she only asked the LAFD to ensure accuracy before public release [10][11].

The fire chief. Former LAFD Chief Kristin Crowley, dismissed a month after the fires, filed a lawsuit alleging her ouster was orchestrated to shift blame away from the mayor's office. Crowley claims Bass needed a scapegoat to avoid accountability for systemic failures in fire preparedness [12].

The ongoing housing crisis. While the Bass administration touts a second consecutive year of declining homelessness counts — down 4% countywide and 3.4% in the city, with unsheltered homelessness falling 9.5% countywide — a RAND Corporation study found that official counts may be undercounting by as much as 32%, with up to 7,900 people potentially missing from the most recent tally [13][14]. The 2025 count reported 72,308 people experiencing homelessness countywide, including 43,699 in the city [13].

In a city where the median household income is $79,701, the median home value is $919,900, and the population exceeds 3.8 million, the gap between governance promises and lived reality has become a chasm [15].

Source: FRED / Bureau of Labor Statistics

Data as of Dec 1, 2025CSV

Pratt's Platform: Populism Meets Policy Sketches

Pratt has articulated positions that blend populist anger with specific — if sometimes legally questionable — policy proposals across LA's top issues:

On homelessness, Pratt has pledged "zero encampments" and a mandatory treatment-first approach. "If you have a drug problem, we're going to get you treatment... You can't leave until we help get you sober," he told Fox News. He has also promised to investigate homeless service organizations, declaring that "the criminal investigation team of the IRS, they're coming into City Hall. We are opening up cases on all these homeless NGOs" — though a city mayor has no authority to direct IRS investigations [16].

On public safety, Pratt has vowed to reject "extreme defund-style politics," prioritize frontline policing, and ensure the city can recruit and retain officers. He committed to "enforcing more crimes than any mayor in the history of Los Angeles" and supporting prosecution of retail theft and organized crime [16][17].

On government accountability, his campaign website promises a "back-to-basics budget" that restores core services, ends automatic contract renewals and "sweetheart deals," and enforces competitive bidding [17].

On fire preparedness, Pratt has accused city leadership of "criminal negligence" in the Palisades Fire, pledging a "streamlined chain of command that empowers first responders, cuts out middlemen, and gets resources to the front lines without delay" [17].

The proposals resonate emotionally but raise immediate questions about feasibility. Mandatory treatment requires state-level authority and funding. IRS investigations are a federal matter. And "zero encampments" confronts a thicket of court rulings, including the Supreme Court's 2024 Grants Pass decision, which gave cities more latitude to clear encampments but still requires available shelter capacity [16].

The Money Question

Detailed campaign finance filings for the 2026 race remain limited in public reporting. Pratt's candidacy was filed with the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission, but comprehensive contribution and expenditure reports have not yet surfaced in media coverage [6]. What is clear is that Pratt's campaign has relied heavily on organic social media reach — a strategy that reduces the burn rate typical of traditional campaigns but also limits the paid advertising, field operations, and get-out-the-vote infrastructure that municipal races typically demand.

Bass, as an incumbent with deep institutional ties to organized labor, the Democratic Party establishment, and Los Angeles's network of political donors, holds an overwhelming structural advantage in fundraising. Her 2022 campaign raised over $7 million, and her incumbency provides access to the full apparatus of city government visibility [18].

The contrast illuminates a fundamental asymmetry: Pratt's candidacy runs on attention and grievance, while Bass's runs on money and machinery. Whether attention can overcome infrastructure in a low-turnout municipal primary is the central question of June 2.

The Celebrity Candidate Question — and Why It May Be the Wrong Frame

The reflexive comparison to Arnold Schwarzenegger's 2003 recall victory, Jesse Ventura's 1998 Minnesota gubernatorial win, or even Volodymyr Zelensky's 2019 Ukrainian presidential campaign is both inevitable and incomplete [19].

Schwarzenegger won 48.6% of the vote in a recall election where the incumbent had already been rejected — and he brought a business empire, global brand, and policy advisors who gave his candidacy substantive architecture. Ventura rode anti-establishment populism in a three-way race, but his governing tenure was marked by legislative gridlock, press antagonism, and plummeting approval ratings. Both assembled unconventional coalitions that transcended party lines — and both discovered that the same quality that made them effective campaigners (independence from political networks) made them ineffective governors (no allies in the legislature) [19].

The more uncomfortable question is whether the "celebrity candidate" frame itself serves as a mechanism for dismissing legitimate voter anger. When 47% of residents disapprove of their mayor, when an after-action fire report may have been altered for political cover, when a fire chief alleges she was scapegoated, and when homelessness counts may be undercounting by a third — voters reaching for an unconventional candidate is not irrational. It is a signal.

Pratt's sister, Stephanie Pratt, publicly dismissed him as "stupid" and "unqualified" — a sentiment shared by much of the political establishment [4]. But the establishment's inability to articulate why voters should be satisfied with the status quo is precisely what creates the opening.

What Would Day One Actually Look Like?

If Pratt were to survive the June 2 primary and win the November 3 runoff, he would confront a governance structure designed to constrain executive power:

The City Charter makes the mayor the chief executive officer of Los Angeles, with authority to appoint and remove general managers of approximately 44 departments — subject to City Council confirmation. All legislative power is vested in the 15-member City Council. The mayor proposes the budget; the council approves it. The mayor can veto ordinances; the council can override [20].

The bureaucracy includes the LAPD, LAFD, Department of Water and Power, Department of Transportation, and dozens of other agencies, each with entrenched leadership, union contracts, and institutional cultures that resist rapid change. The DWP alone — the nation's largest municipal utility — operates with significant independence from the mayor's office.

Labor unions, including SEIU Local 721, AFSCME, and the city's firefighter and police unions, hold enormous practical power through collective bargaining agreements, political endorsements, and the ability to mobilize in city council fights. A mayor without union support governs at a significant disadvantage.

The practical reality: even popular, experienced mayors struggle to redirect LA's sprawling municipal government. For a first-time officeholder with no political network, no council allies, and no experience navigating Sacramento or Washington for the state and federal funding that underpins city services, the learning curve would be measured in years, not weeks.

A Fourteen-Candidate Field and a City at a Crossroads

The June 2 primary features 14 certified candidates, with the top two advancing to the November runoff regardless of party [18]. In this environment, Pratt does not need majority support — he needs to finish in the top two. In a field this fragmented, with this many undecided voters, 10% could be enough.

The real competition for the second runoff slot may be between Pratt and Nithya Raman, the City Councilmember who entered the race on February 7, 2026 — hours before the filing deadline and weeks after having endorsed Bass for reelection [21]. Raman, backed by the Democratic Socialists of America and progressive groups, represents the left flank of the Democratic coalition. Her 9.3% trails Pratt's 10.2% within the margin of error, making the primary a genuine three-way contest for two slots.

For Los Angeles — a city of 3.8 million people, a $12 billion annual budget, and challenges that range from earthquake preparedness to hosting the 2028 Olympics — the stakes of this race extend well beyond any individual candidate. The real story is not that a reality TV star is polling at 10%. It is that an incumbent mayor of the second-largest city in America cannot break 20% — and more than half the electorate has not yet decided whom to trust with the job.

The primary is 74 days away. In Los Angeles politics, that is enough time for everything to change — or for nothing to change at all.