Golden Knights Defeat Hurricanes in Come-From-Behind Game 1 to Open Stanley Cup Finals

The Vegas Golden Knights trailed 2-0 midway through the first period of the 2026 Stanley Cup Final opener. Nikolaj Ehlers had scored twice — the first just 25 seconds in, the second on a breakaway backhand — and Lenovo Center was shaking. Sixty minutes later, it was silent. Tomas Hertl buried the go-ahead goal with 3:24 left in regulation to give Vegas a 5-4 win and a 1-0 series lead, making the Golden Knights the first road team in NHL history to overcome a multi-goal deficit to win Game 1 of the Stanley Cup Final [1][2].

The game was the first in Cup Final history to feature goals in the opening 30 seconds of each of the first two periods [3]. Nine goals, 50 shots, four lead changes — and a result that may say less about which team is better and more about which team bends without breaking.

The Comeback, Player by Player

Vegas's rally began on the stick of Shea Theodore. At 13:28 of the first period, Theodore's one-timer from the right point deflected off Eric Robinson's shin and past Frederik Andersen, cutting the deficit to 2-1 [4]. Theodore finished with a goal and two assists, and the numbers behind his performance were stark: with Theodore on the ice, the Golden Knights controlled 70.4% of expected goals at five-on-five and outscored Carolina 4-2 [5].

Source: ESPN Box Score

Data as of Jun 2, 2026CSV

Ivan Barbashev tied the game at 2-2 in the second period off a feed from Jack Eichel [2]. Brett Howden put Vegas ahead 3-2 just 81 seconds into the third, tipping in a shot-pass from Theodore, who had beaten Sean Walker with a move at the top of the circle before threading the puck to the back door [4]. Jordan Staal answered for Carolina to tie it at 3-3, and after William Karlsson made it 4-3 Vegas, Shayne Gostisbehere's goal knotted the score at 4-4 [2].

Then came the sequence that decided the game. Carter Hart caught a Seth Jarvis one-timer with his glove — a save that, in retrospect, kept the Golden Knights alive. Twenty-one seconds later, Colton Sissons found Hertl in front, and the Czech center buried it [6]. Gostisbehere, who had just tied the game, was the defender who lost his man on the winning goal [7].

Tortorella's Fingerprints

John Tortorella was hired with eight games left in the regular season after the Golden Knights fired Bruce Cassidy. Vegas went 7-0-1 down the stretch under Tortorella, then swept the Presidents' Trophy-winning Colorado Avalanche in the Western Conference Final [8]. Game 1 against Carolina was the latest exhibit of his intermission impact: twelve of Vegas's 20 wins under Tortorella have been comebacks [7].

The adjustments between the first and second periods were visible immediately. Vegas's 5-on-5 shot share climbed from 33.3% in the first period to 53.8% in the second, then settled at 34.3% in the third — but by then the Knights were playing with a lead or tied, content to counterattack [9]. Tortorella's system, as Theodore has described it, centers on relentless pressure: "Torts' whole thing is pressure, pressure, pressure, try and get it out as fast as you can" [8].

The shift was partly structural — Vegas came out of the intermission forechecking higher and winning puck battles along the boards — and partly opportunistic. Carolina's power play, a problem all postseason, went 0-for-2 in Game 1 without recording a single shot on goal in four minutes of man-advantage time [10]. Through 14 playoff games, the Hurricanes' power play has converted at just 12.1% (7-for-58), a rate that effectively hands momentum back to opponents every time a penalty is called [10].

The Case That Carolina Was the Better Team

Despite losing, the Hurricanes have a credible argument that they outplayed Vegas in the metrics that typically predict future outcomes. Carolina held a 27-23 shot advantage. In the first period, the Hurricanes outshot Vegas 10-3, dominating territorial play before the Golden Knights found their legs [9].

Source: ESPN Box Score

Data as of Jun 2, 2026CSV

Vegas finished with a 39.7% overall 5-on-5 shot share — meaning Carolina generated roughly 60% of the shot attempts [9]. In most games, the team controlling possession at that rate wins. The Golden Knights did not need to control the puck to win; they scored on a higher percentage of their chances.

Carolina's top line of Seth Jarvis, Sebastian Aho, and Andrei Svechnikov was outplayed at 5-on-5, owning just 47.0% of expected goals when on the ice together [5]. But that figure is partially a product of Vegas's targeted deployment of Theodore against that unit. Rod Brind'Amour has options to adjust those matchups in Game 2 at home — especially if he can get last change and keep his top line away from Theodore's pairing.

The steelman case for Carolina rests on three pillars: they dominated first-period shot volume, they generated the game's most dangerous breakaway chances (Ehlers's two goals, Jarvis's one-timer that Hart barely gloved), and they tied the game twice after falling behind in the third period. A team that can do all of that on home ice and still lose by one goal has not been outclassed — it has been outfinished. Whether that distinction matters over seven games is the central question of this series.

Vegas's Comeback DNA

The Golden Knights are no strangers to deficits. In the Western Conference Final against Colorado, Vegas trailed 3-0 after one period in Game 3 before winning 5-3, the first time in franchise history the team had overcome a three-goal playoff deficit [11]. Colorado had been 45-0-0 when leading after two periods (41-0-0 in the regular season, 4-0 in the playoffs) before Vegas ended that streak [11].

Since entering the league in 2017-18, Vegas has played 122 playoff games, the most of any franchise in that span [12]. That playoff mileage has produced a roster accustomed to high-pressure swings. The Golden Knights are 7-0 this postseason when leading after two periods, and their plus-19 goal differential is the best in the 2026 playoffs [8].

Carolina's playoff experience is comparable in volume if not in pedigree. The Hurricanes have made eight straight postseason appearances under Brind'Amour and have played 102 playoff games since 2018-19, tied for second in the league behind the Dallas Stars' 109 [12]. But this is Carolina's first Cup Final under Brind'Amour, who last reached this stage as a player and captain when the Hurricanes won their only championship in 2006 [12].

The Marner Factor

Mitch Marner entered the Cup Final as the leading scorer in the 2026 playoffs with 21 points (seven goals, 14 assists) in 16 games [13]. After nine seasons with the Toronto Maple Leafs — where he never advanced past the second round — the 29-year-old signed with Vegas in a sign-and-trade on July 1, 2025 [14].

The storyline has a twist of irony: Marner used his no-trade clause last year to reject a deal to Carolina because his wife was in her third trimester [14]. Now he is four wins away from winning the Cup against the team he refused to join. If Vegas wins the series, Marner is the presumptive Conn Smythe Trophy winner [15].

Marner did not score in Game 1, but his presence on the top power play and his ability to create off the rush remain central to Vegas's offensive identity. His 21 playoff points already surpass his previous career best of 14, set with Toronto in 2023 [13].

The Most Lopsided Matchup

The advanced stats from Game 1 identified one matchup as decisive: Theodore's pairing against Carolina's top forwards. With Theodore on the ice, Vegas controlled 70.4% of expected goals and outscored Carolina 4-2 at five-on-five [5]. Theodore's three-point night (1G, 2A) was the statistical spine of the comeback.

The question is whether this matchup is sustainable. On the road, Tortorella does not have last change, meaning Brind'Amour can deploy his top line against a different defensive pair. In Games 3 and 4 in Las Vegas, Tortorella will have the matchup advantage and can ensure Theodore draws the Aho-Svechnikov line. The home-ice chess match will likely determine whether Theodore continues to dominate or whether Brind'Amour can neutralize him.

Carolina's defensive pair of Sean Walker, who was beaten by Theodore on the play that set up Howden's goal, may face adjustment. Brind'Amour could also look at sheltering his top line with more offensive-zone starts, though Carolina's inability to generate power-play shots limits that strategy.

What's at Stake Beyond the Ice

Both franchises have seen their valuations surge in recent years. The Golden Knights are valued at approximately $2.1 billion, while the Hurricanes sit at roughly $2.0 billion [16]. The growth trajectories tell different stories: when Sportico first published NHL valuations in 2021, the Hurricanes ranked 28th at $545 million. They have nearly quadrupled in value over five years, the fastest growth rate in the league [16].

Source: Sportico / Forbes

Data as of Jan 1, 2026CSV

For Vegas, a second Cup in four years would cement the franchise as one of the NHL's premier operations — a nine-year-old team with two championships in a city that had no major professional sports teams a decade ago. The economic impact of a deep playoff run in Southern Nevada is estimated in the hundreds of millions, driven by the overlap between hockey fans and the city's tourism infrastructure [17].

For Carolina, the stakes are different. The Hurricanes have not won the Stanley Cup since 2006, a 20-year drought that spans the franchise's transformation from a small-market curiosity to a consistent contender. A championship under Brind'Amour — who captained the 2006 team — would validate eight years of sustained excellence and potentially accelerate the franchise's already rapid valuation growth [12].

The average NHL franchise is now worth $2.2 billion, and the combined value of all 32 clubs exceeds $67 billion, up from roughly $32 billion in 2022 [16]. A Cup win for either team would drive local sponsorship deals, ticket-price increases, and merchandise revenue that compounds over years.

What Game 1 Tells Us — and What It Doesn't

Game 1 established that the Golden Knights can win in Carolina even when outshot and outpossessed. It established that the Hurricanes' power play remains a liability, that Theodore is capable of tilting a game on his own, and that Ehlers can score on anyone. It did not establish that Vegas is the better team. A 39.7% shot share typically does not hold up over a seven-game series. Carolina's process was, in many respects, sound — they just didn't get the saves or finish the chances at the rate they needed.

The series shifts to Game 2 in Carolina, where the Hurricanes will have last change and the Lenovo Center crowd behind them again. If Brind'Amour can fix the power play — or at least generate shots on it — and find a way to shelter the Aho line from Theodore, the underlying numbers suggest Carolina can level the series. If they can't, Vegas's ability to win games it has no statistical right to win becomes less about variance and more about identity.