Former Rival Enters Maine Senate Race Against Scandal-Plagued Platner

On April 30, Maine Gov. Janet Mills stood before reporters and conceded what the polling had been telling her for months: she could not beat Graham Platner. The oyster farmer from Sullivan Harbor had outraised her, outpolled her, and out-organized her. Mills suspended her campaign, clearing the path for Platner to claim the Democratic nomination and take on five-term Republican Sen. Susan Collins in November [1].

Thirty-two days later, Mills told a Maine newspaper columnist five words that scrambled the race again: "I am still on the ballot" [2].

The intervening month had produced a rolling series of revelations about Platner's personal conduct — extramarital sexting with multiple women, an active account on a messaging app flagged for child safety concerns, and fresh scrutiny of old Reddit posts and a tattoo resembling a Nazi SS symbol. Together, they constitute what may be the most consequential scandal cycle in a 2026 Senate race that Democrats view as central to their hopes of retaking the upper chamber.

The Scandals: A Timeline

Platner's troubles did not begin with the sexting story. They began in October 2025, when reporters unearthed deleted Reddit posts in which Platner made racist comments, blamed sexual assault victims, mocked a wounded soldier injured during a Taliban ambush, called himself a "communist," and said police officers are "bastards" [3]. Around the same time, his chest tattoo — a design resembling the Totenkopf, the skull-and-crossbones insignia used by Nazi SS concentration camp guards — became a focal point of Republican attacks [4].

Platner, a former Army and Marine Corps veteran, said he got the tattoo in 2007 during a night of drinking while stationed in Croatia and did not understand its meaning at the time. He had it covered up earlier this year. However, two acquaintances told reporters that Platner had described the tattoo as a Nazi symbol years before it became public [4]. Democratic Rep. Jake Auchincloss called it "disqualifying" [5].

The most damaging revelation came on May 31, when The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times reported that Platner had exchanged sexually explicit text messages with at least six women after his November 2023 marriage to Amy Gertner [6]. Gertner discovered the messages in spring 2025 and alerted the campaign, which deemed it a private matter. Genevieve McDonald, Platner's former political director, confirmed to CNN that she was told of the sexting and that the campaign evaluated it as a political liability [7].

Fox News subsequently reported that Platner maintained an active profile on Kik, a messaging app that has faced scrutiny over child exploitation risks. His profile reportedly displayed a shirtless mirror selfie. Platner's campaign told The Wall Street Journal that while his account remained active, he had deleted the app from his phone [8].

No formal criminal investigation or charges have resulted from any of these revelations. The scandals are personal and ethical in nature, not legal.

Mills' Exit — and Possible Return

Janet Mills entered the Senate race in October 2025, but by the time she launched, Platner had already captured the energy of Maine's Democratic base. He was drawing large crowds and raising money at a pace Mills could not match [9].

Source: FEC / Common Dreams

Data as of Apr 15, 2026CSV

By February 2026, a University of New Hampshire poll showed Platner leading Mills 64% to 26% in the primary [10]. An Emerson College poll in March put the gap at 55% to 28% [11]. Mills raised $2.7 million in Q1 2026, compared to Platner's $4.1 million, and his Q4 2025 haul of $4.7 million had already established financial dominance [12]. On April 30, Mills suspended active campaigning, citing difficulty raising money. But she did not file the paperwork with the Maine Secretary of State's office to remove her name from the ballot [1].

That distinction matters. Under Maine election law, a candidate who suspends rather than withdraws remains eligible to receive votes. The primary filing deadline passed on March 16, 2026, meaning no new candidate can enter the race — but Mills never left it in a legal sense [13]. Her votes will be counted on June 9.

Source: UNH/Emerson College Polling

Data as of Jun 2, 2026CSV

Mills' June 1 statement was carefully worded but unmistakable in its implication. Supporters began urging her to resume active campaigning [2]. She reactivated her campaign's social media presence with a Pride Month post the same day. The question is whether one week of renewed effort can overcome a 66-point polling deficit — Platner stood at 76% in a late May survey, with Mills at just 10% [14].

The Case for Platner

Platner's supporters offer several arguments for why the scandals should not end his candidacy.

First, they point to the political environment. Democrats need every competitive seat to retake the Senate, and Platner is the only Democratic candidate consistently polling ahead of Collins. The most recent UNH Pine Tree State Poll, conducted May 21-25, showed Platner leading Collins 51% to 42% — a 9-point margin [15]. A Pan Atlantic Research survey from May 8-18 put the gap at 7 points [16].

Source: UNH Pine Tree State Poll / Pan Atlantic Research

Data as of May 27, 2026CSV

Second, Platner's campaign released an internal memo arguing the scandals have not dented his support. Citing a Public Policy Polling survey, the memo claimed Platner led Collins 49% to 45% even after the sexting story broke. The campaign also reported an 18% increase in small-dollar donations in the days following the news, with Maine-based donors driving a 27% increase [17].

Sen. Bernie Sanders, who has endorsed Platner, defended him publicly: "We should be focusing on the crises facing the working class and electing people of the guts to stand up to the oligarchs" [18]. Sen. Ruben Gallego of Arizona argued that Platner "is winning the polls and has grown as a person" [19].

Platner himself has framed the issue as one of personal redemption. "Amy and I went through something hard — because of me. We did the work, and I'm grateful for her every hour of every day," he said [20]. His wife posted a five-minute video defending him and described the coverage as "shameful," adding: "People don't care about gossip or headlines, they care that you're fighting for their hospitals" [21].

Supporters also point to the timing of the revelations — emerging in the final stretch before a pivotal primary — as evidence of political motivation, though no specific orchestrating party has been identified.

The Case Against

Critics within the Democratic Party have been vocal.

Sen. John Fetterman called Platner a "creep" [22]. Rep. Auchincloss said Platner's brand of politics would not "win us durable majorities" [20]. Sen. Cory Booker acknowledged Platner "has questions to answer" [23]. The Bulwark published an analysis titled "The Problem With Platner," arguing that accumulated controversies make him a general-election liability against Collins [24].

The concern is not just moral but strategic. Collins, first elected in 1996, has survived competitive races before — most recently defeating Democrat Sara Gideon 51% to 42% in 2020 [25]. Republican-aligned super PACs are already spending heavily. Pine Tree Results PAC, formed in early 2025, raised $12.7 million through March 2026, funded by hedge-fund founder Louis Bacon ($500,000), Liberty Media chairman emeritus John Malone ($500,000), and investor William Oberndorf ($250,000), among others [26].

Platner's scandals give these groups ammunition. Critics argue that the Reddit posts, the tattoo, and the sexting collectively paint a portrait of judgment failures that Republicans will exploit relentlessly from June through November.

The Money Race

Platner's fundraising operation is built on small-dollar grassroots donations, largely through ActBlue. His campaign rejects PAC money. While Democratic megadonor George Soros and his son Alexander each gave the $7,000 maximum, the bulk of Platner's funds come from individual donors — approximately 88,000 supporters contributed to his $4.1 million Q1 2026 haul [12].

No reporting has confirmed major Democratic donors or party committees shifting funds from Platner to Mills since the scandal broke. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has not publicly weighed in on the primary. Mills' financial disadvantage was a primary reason she suspended her campaign, and there is no public evidence that new donor commitments have materialized to support a revived Mills effort.

On the Republican side, Collins benefits from both her incumbency fundraising apparatus and the Pine Tree Results PAC's $12.7 million war chest, drawn from some of the Republican Party's wealthiest donors and dark-money nonprofits [26].

Maine's Electoral Landscape

Maine is one of two states (along with Nebraska) that splits its Electoral College votes by congressional district, and its politics reflect a similar complexity. The state uses ranked-choice voting in both the primary and general elections [13].

Collins has held the seat since 1997, making her Maine's longest-serving member of Congress and the longest-serving Republican woman in Senate history [25]. She won reelection in 2020 despite heavy national Democratic spending, in part because of strong personal favorability and crossover appeal among independent voters.

Platner's coalition looks different from past Collins challengers. He draws disproportionate support from men — leading Collins by 41 points among male voters (63% to 22%), compared to an 18-point lead among women (50% to 32%), according to Emerson polling [11]. His favorability among unenrolled (independent) voters stands at 61% favorable to 21% unfavorable [11].

The question is whether the scandals erode support among the voter groups most sensitive to character issues — particularly women and suburban independents. Internal polling from Platner's campaign claims otherwise, but independent post-scandal surveys that include crosstabs by gender and geography have not yet been published.

Historical Precedent

Scandal-plagued candidates in Maine Senate races have limited historical precedent. The state's political culture tends toward pragmatism and personal relationships with officeholders. Collins herself weathered significant backlash after her 2018 vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, with Democrats raising over $4 million in protest donations — yet she won reelection two years later by nearly 9 points [25].

Nationally, scandal-affected Senate candidates have mixed records. Some — like Louisiana's David Vitter, who won reelection in 2010 after a prostitution scandal — have survived by maintaining base support and facing weak opponents. Others, like Missouri's Todd Akin in 2012, saw a single controversial remark collapse an otherwise winnable race. The difference often comes down to whether the scandal reinforces or contradicts the candidate's core brand. Platner has built his campaign on authenticity and working-class populism; the sexting and deception undercut that narrative in ways that a policy controversy would not.

What Happens Next

The June 9 primary is five days away. Platner remains the overwhelming favorite, but the race is no longer a formality. Mills' name is on the ballot, and her public statements have injected uncertainty into what was a settled contest.

If Platner wins the primary — as polling strongly suggests he will — the general election against Collins becomes the central test case for whether Democratic voters' desire to retake the Senate outweighs concerns about their nominee's character. Platner's 9-point lead over Collins in the most recent poll provides a cushion, but that margin was measured before the sexting story's full impact could be assessed [15].

If Mills somehow closes a gap that stood at 66 points as recently as late May, it would represent one of the most dramatic primary reversals in modern Senate campaign history. Her allies argue that absentee ballots already cast for Platner before the scandal broke may limit any late swing — but also that Maine's ranked-choice system could produce unexpected dynamics if David Costello, the third active candidate, draws enough support to trigger a second-round reallocation [14].

Democrats in Washington are watching closely. A meeting between Platner and Democratic senators on June 2 produced little public comment, with participants offering guarded assessments [27]. The party faces a familiar dilemma: a flawed nominee who polls well, or the chaos of trying to replace him with a candidate who already proved she could not win.

For Maine voters, the choice is more personal. Do the scandals reflect who Platner is, or who he was? His answer — that transformation "is kind of just a normal human trait" — will be tested at the ballot box [28].