Deadly Chemical Implosion at Longview, Texas Paper Mill Injures and Kills Workers

At 7:15 a.m. on May 26, 2026, a 900,000-gallon tank of white liquor—a corrosive alkaline mixture of sodium hydroxide, sodium sulfide, and disodium carbonate used to dissolve wood into pulp—ruptured at the Nippon Dynawave Packaging Company mill in Longview, Washington [1]. The implosion released an estimated 810,000 gallons of caustic chemical solution, engulfing workers, flooding drainage systems, and triggering what Cowlitz County officials called a "mass casualty scene" [2].

By the end of Tuesday, at least one worker was confirmed dead. Nine others remained unaccounted for. Eight employees and one firefighter had been transported to hospitals, some with critical chemical burns [3]. The tank itself remained structurally unstable, preventing recovery crews from reaching the areas where the missing workers were last known to be [4].

What Happened: Timeline and Emergency Response

The Longview Fire Department received the first emergency call at 7:19 a.m. [4]. Approximately 40 firefighters and paramedics responded, along with a regional hazardous materials team [5]. Workers near the tank at the time of the rupture were struck by a wave of white liquor—a substance heated to high temperatures during the kraft pulping process and caustic enough to cause severe chemical burns on contact [6].

First responders performed decontamination procedures on site before transporting victims. Nine patients were received at PeaceHealth St. John Medical Center in Longview; one died, two were transferred to Legacy Oregon Burn Center in Portland for specialized treatment, and six were listed in fair condition [5]. The injured firefighter was treated and released [3].

By Tuesday afternoon, the structural instability of the damaged tank forced officials to suspend recovery operations. Cowlitz Fire and Rescue Chief Scott Goldstein told reporters that the tank still held an estimated 90,000 gallons of white liquor and could not be safely approached [4]. When pressed on the number of missing workers, Goldstein said: "We have information on that, but we're not releasing that information" [4]. Recovery operations were set to resume Wednesday morning.

A family assistance center was established at the local union hall [7].

The Chemical: What Is White Liquor?

White liquor is the primary cooking chemical in the kraft process, the dominant method of turning wood chips into paper pulp. It consists mainly of sodium hydroxide (lye) and sodium sulfide dissolved in water, creating a strongly alkaline solution with a pH above 13 [6]. When heated—as it is during the pulping process—it becomes even more reactive.

Unlike an oil spill, white liquor cannot be contained with booms or absorbent materials. According to fire officials, it "self-neutralizes with water over time" but poses acute danger through skin contact and inhalation of vapors [1]. The spilled material entered a drainage ditch connected to a diking system that discharges to the Columbia River, raising environmental concerns [1].

The Facility: Nippon Dynawave's History in Longview

The Longview mill has been manufacturing paper products since 1953 [8]. In 2016, Japan-based Nippon Paper Group purchased the facility from Weyerhaeuser for $285 million, establishing Nippon Dynawave Packaging as a subsidiary [1]. The mill employs approximately 1,000 workers—about 550 in the pulp and paper operation and 450 at an adjacent liquid packaging plant—and produces roughly 280,000 tons of bleached liquid packaging paperboard annually, used in products like milk cartons and juice boxes [8][3].

The facility sits along the Columbia River in a city with deep ties to the timber and paper industry. Longview was founded as a planned company town in 1923 by the Long-Bell Lumber Company, and paper production has been central to the local economy for over a century.

Regulatory Record: Citations, Fines, and Open Complaints

Nippon Dynawave's compliance history shows a pattern of modest violations and minimal financial penalties. According to records reviewed by the Seattle Times, the EPA issued 19 informal and 5 formal citations over five years for air and water permit violations, resulting in $16,000 in total fines—of which only $10,000 was collected [1]. Washington's Department of Ecology fined the company $6,500 in 2024 [1].

On the workplace safety side, the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries conducted three inspections over the past five years [7]. Those inspections produced:

• A $700 fine for missing guardrails on a platform where a worker was exposed to a fall hazard above four feet [7]
• A $2,700 fine during the COVID-19 pandemic for inadequate face-covering compliance [7]
• A citation—with no fine—after a worker lost a finger and the company moved equipment from the accident scene before state investigators could examine it [7]

Two additional safety complaints were filed against Nippon Dynawave in 2026—one on March 4 and another on May 6, just 20 days before the implosion [9]. Both cases remained open at the time of the incident, and details about the nature of the complaints were not publicly available [9].

Federal OSHA cited the facility twice in five years, with one $700 fine [1]. The Longview paper mill was also fined $4,000 for four alleged permit violations at its sanitary treatment plant [10].

The Cause: What Made the Tank Fail?

The cause of the rupture remains under investigation [3]. Authorities have not publicly identified a specific failure mechanism—whether structural fatigue, corrosion, a pressure anomaly, or human error.

The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) has investigated analogous incidents at paper mills. In 2017, an explosion at Packaging Corporation of America's DeRidder, Louisiana, pulp and paper mill killed three contract workers performing hot work above a tank containing flammable materials [11]. The CSB's final report found that the company had failed to apply process safety management principles to certain tank systems, and the Board reiterated a 2002 recommendation to OSHA to extend its Process Safety Management (PSM) standard to cover atmospheric storage tanks interconnected with covered processes [11].

That 2002 recommendation remains unimplemented more than two decades later [11].

Whether the Nippon Dynawave white liquor tank fell under PSM requirements—or should have—will be a central question in the forthcoming investigation. Atmospheric storage tanks holding non-flammable but hazardous chemicals often exist in a regulatory gray zone: too dangerous to ignore, but not covered by the strictest federal process safety rules.

Source: CSB, OSHA, news reports

Data as of May 27, 2026CSV

Workers: Employees, Contractors, and the Question of Who Was Exposed

Initial reports described all of the injured and missing as "employees" of Nippon Dynawave [3][5]. The distinction matters. Contract and temporary workers at industrial facilities sometimes receive less comprehensive safety training, inferior personal protective equipment, and fewer legal protections than direct employees. The CSB's DeRidder investigation specifically found that all three fatalities were contract workers [11].

OSHA's multi-employer worksite doctrine holds that a controlling employer can be cited for hazards affecting contract workers, but enforcement has been inconsistent, and contractors often fall through accountability gaps in practice. Whether any of the Longview victims were contractors or temporary staffing agency employees has not been confirmed by authorities.

Under Washington state law, all employers—including staffing agencies and host employers—share responsibility for worker safety. The state's Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) has authority to inspect and cite both the host employer and the staffing agency when temporary workers are injured [12].

Industry Context: Fatalities in U.S. Paper and Pulp Mills

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported 10 fatalities in U.S. paper manufacturing in 2020, with 8 caused by contact with objects or equipment [13]. In 2022, the broader paper manufacturing category recorded 13 fatalities, including three at paperboard mills [14]. A 1993 federal study of occupational deaths in pulp, paper, and paperboard mills from 1979 to 1984 found that 28% were caused by workers caught in rotating equipment at "nip points," and 18% by workers crushed by falling objects like rolls and bales [13].

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries

Data as of May 27, 2026CSV

International comparisons are imperfect but instructive. Finland's pulp and paper industry reported an accident rate below the national manufacturing average as of 1990, while Canada's rates from 1990 to 1994 were comparable to other industries [15]. Scandinavian countries generally enforce stricter process safety frameworks, with more frequent inspections, higher penalties, and stronger worker co-determination rights that give employees direct input on safety practices [15].

The gap is structural. Nordic countries tend to integrate chemical safety regulation into comprehensive occupational health frameworks administered by a single agency, while the United States splits authority between OSHA (workplace safety), the EPA (environmental releases), and the CSB (incident investigation with no enforcement power). That fragmentation creates seams that incidents like the Longview implosion expose.

Economic Pressures and Deferred Maintenance

The American paper industry has been under sustained economic pressure for years. Declining demand for printing and writing paper, competition from overseas producers, and rising energy and raw material costs have driven a wave of mill closures and consolidation [16]. The mills that remain operational face constant pressure to reduce costs.

Industry experts have cautioned that maintenance is an area where cost-cutting carries outsized risk. Reactive maintenance strategies—fixing equipment after it fails rather than on a preventive schedule—are associated with increased safety incidents, unplanned downtime, and cascading failures [16]. A large-capacity tank holding caustic chemicals at high temperatures requires regular inspection of welds, walls, supports, and connected piping. Deferred inspection of such infrastructure can allow corrosion or fatigue to progress undetected.

Whether Nippon Dynawave had reduced maintenance spending or deferred inspections of the white liquor tank system is not yet known. The company has not issued a detailed public statement beyond confirming the incident and cooperating with authorities.

Legal Remedies for Victims' Families

Because the incident occurred in Washington state—not Texas, as some early reports incorrectly stated—the legal framework governing victims' families differs from the Texas workers' compensation system referenced in the original reporting on this story.

Washington operates a state-run, monopolistic workers' compensation system administered by the Department of Labor and Industries [17]. Eligible family members of workers killed on the job can receive a one-time payment equal to one month of the state's average wage, plus a monthly pension based on the deceased worker's earnings [17]. Funeral benefits are capped at twice the state's average monthly wage [17].

Critically, Washington's workers' compensation law includes an "exclusive remedy" provision that generally bars employees from suing their employer in tort for workplace injuries or death [17]. Families can, however, pursue claims against third parties—equipment manufacturers, contractors, or other entities whose negligence may have contributed to the incident.

For comparison, Texas is unusual in that it allows employers to opt out of workers' compensation entirely. When a Texas employer is a "non-subscriber," injured workers and their families can sue directly for damages without the caps and limitations of the workers' compensation system [18]. Some states without caps on wrongful death damages—such as California, New York, and Illinois—allow families to recover compensation for pain and suffering, loss of companionship, and punitive damages that are unavailable under most workers' compensation frameworks [18].

The families of the Longview victims may have their strongest legal avenue through third-party product liability or negligence claims—against the tank manufacturer, engineering firms, or maintenance contractors—if investigation reveals that equipment failure or outside negligence contributed to the rupture.

The Counterargument: Are Existing Regulations Sufficient?

Industry representatives and some safety professionals argue that the existing regulatory framework, if followed, is adequate to prevent incidents like the Longview implosion. OSHA's general duty clause requires employers to maintain a workplace "free from recognized hazards," and specific standards under 29 CFR 1910.261 address hazards in pulp, paper, and paperboard mills [12]. The American Forest & Paper Association has pointed to decades of declining injury rates in the industry as evidence that safety systems work when properly implemented.

From this perspective, the Longview incident represents a failure of compliance or operational execution, not a failure of regulation. A tank that ruptures was either improperly maintained, improperly inspected, or subjected to conditions outside its design parameters—all of which are already prohibited under existing rules.

Critics of this view counter that the penalty structure provides insufficient deterrent. A company operating a 900,000-gallon tank of caustic chemicals that receives a $700 fine for a fall-protection violation faces no meaningful financial incentive to exceed minimum compliance. The CSB's unanswered 2002 recommendation to expand PSM coverage to atmospheric tanks suggests that regulators themselves have identified gaps they lack the authority—or political will—to close [11].

What Comes Next

The Washington State Department of Labor and Industries has opened an investigation. Federal OSHA and the CSB may also investigate, though the CSB's diminished funding and staffing in recent years have limited its capacity to take on new cases.

For the families of the nine missing workers, the most immediate question is whether their loved ones will be found. The structural instability of the damaged tank has turned what should be a recovery operation into an engineering challenge. Each hour that passes reduces the likelihood of finding survivors in the caustic environment.

The broader question—whether this incident was a tragic but isolated failure, or a predictable consequence of systemic underinvestment in industrial safety—will take months or years to answer. The investigation will need to determine not just what caused the tank to fail, but whether anyone knew it could, and whether the systems meant to prevent it were working or had been allowed to decay.

Longview has built its identity around the paper industry for more than a century. What happened at Nippon Dynawave on May 26 will test whether that relationship can survive the weight of what the industry owes to the people inside its mills.