Anti-Trump 'No Kings' Protests Aim for Record Turnout Nationwide

On March 28, 2026, more than 3,300 demonstrations are scheduled across every U.S. congressional district and all 50 states, from Alaska to the Florida Keys [1][2]. Organizers of the "No Kings" movement — now in its third nationwide mobilization since June 2025 — say they expect to surpass the estimated 7 million participants who turned out for the October 2025 round [3], an event that already dwarfed the 2017 Women's March, previously considered the largest single-day protest in American history at 3.3 to 4.6 million participants [4].

The flagship rally in St. Paul, Minnesota — featuring Bruce Springsteen, Joan Baez, Jane Fonda, and Senator Bernie Sanders — is expected to draw between 50,000 and 100,000 people to the State Capitol alone [5][6]. But the movement's reach extends far beyond blue-state strongholds: nearly half of all planned demonstrations are in red or battleground states, up 40% from the first No Kings Day, and two-thirds of events are outside major urban centers [3][7].

What Sparked the Movement

The "No Kings" name draws on a legal and constitutional lineage stretching back to the American founding — and more recently, to Justice Sonia Sotomayor's dissent in the 2024 Supreme Court decision Trump v. United States, in which she wrote that "the President is now a king above the law" [8]. Senator Chuck Schumer introduced the No Kings Act in August 2024, a proposed bill to abolish presidential immunity in response to that ruling [9].

But the protests themselves were triggered by a cascade of Trump administration actions during his second term. The first No Kings Day, on June 14, 2025, drew roughly 5 million people and was a direct response to mass ICE raids, the deployment of the National Guard to Democratic-run cities, and what organizers described as "authoritarian power grabs" [2][10]. The movement intensified after federal immigration agents fatally shot Renee Good and Alex Pretti during Operation Metro Surge in Minneapolis — the largest immigration enforcement operation in U.S. history — prompting weeks of sustained protest in the Twin Cities [1][11].

By March 2026, the list of grievances has grown. Organizers cite the unauthorized war with Iran — now one month old, with over 1,500 Iranian civilian deaths and 13 U.S. service members killed, according to reports cited by organizers [3] — along with the diversion of healthcare funds to military spending, a Department of Homeland Security shutdown since February 14, and ongoing crackdowns on progressive organizations [2][7].

"People are coming out in every state, in every county, collectively, and saying, 'Enough,'" said Leah Greenberg, co-founder of Indivisible, one of the lead organizing groups. "We are going to stand against illegal war abroad. We are going to stand against secret police at home" [7].

Who's Behind the Mobilization

The No Kings Coalition is not a single organization but a network of progressive groups coordinating at both national and local levels. National-level coordination comes from Indivisible, MoveOn, and 50501 — a movement that emerged to resist Trump's second-term agenda [2][12]. The broader coalition includes the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the ACLU, Public Citizen, Common Defense (a veterans' group), and the Immigrant Defense Network [7][12].

Funding details remain partially opaque. Indivisible received a two-year, $3 million grant from the Open Society Foundations in 2023 and solicits donations to provide training, digital tools, and marketing support for local organizers [12]. A nonprofit called Home of the Brave is running a $1 million newspaper ad campaign in hundreds of publications nationwide to promote the March 28 events [12]. But much of the organizing is decentralized: local coalitions of civil rights organizations, labor unions, religious communities, and issue-specific nonprofits handle logistics on the ground [2].

Demographic data from organizers shows an intergenerational movement, with significant participation from older adults through groups like Third Act, founded by environmentalist Bill McKibben for activists over 60 [1]. The geographic expansion into rural and conservative areas is the movement's most notable shift. Organizers report surging participation in deeply Republican states like Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, and Utah, and "huge" increases in competitive suburban areas — Bucks and Delaware counties in Pennsylvania, East Cobb and Forsyth in Georgia, Scottsdale and Chandler in Arizona [10].

The Numbers: Growth Trajectory

The No Kings movement has grown with each successive round:

• June 14, 2025 (No Kings 1): ~5 million participants across approximately 2,000 events [3][10]
• October 2025 (No Kings 2): ~7 million participants across ~2,600 events [3]
• March 28, 2026 (No Kings 3): 3,300+ events planned; organizers project 9 million+ participants [3][13]

Source: Time, NPR, Wikipedia

Data as of Mar 28, 2026CSV

Major city estimates from previous rounds give a sense of scale. In October, Washington, D.C. drew over 200,000 protesters; Chicago saw approximately 250,000; New York City between 100,000 (NYPD estimate) and 350,000 (organizer estimate); and the San Francisco Bay Area tallied around 220,000 [3]. Each of these cities expects March 28 to exceed those figures.

Political Context: Record Unpopularity

The protests are occurring against a backdrop of historically low approval ratings for President Trump. Polling aggregates show a net approval of approximately -16.7, with 46.7% of Americans strongly disapproving — both second-term records [14]. The Civiqs tracker of registered voters puts the gap even wider, at 39% approval versus 57% disapproval [14]. Trump has been underwater in CNN's rolling average every day since March 12, 2025 — over a full year [14].

The Iran war has accelerated the decline. Rising gas prices — WTI crude oil spiked from roughly $65 per barrel in late February to nearly $99 by March 20 — have hit consumers directly [15]. Trump's net approval on handling the economy sits at -21.3, and on inflation at -32.7, according to recent polling [14].

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

Data as of Mar 23, 2026CSV

The White House has dismissed the protests. A spokesperson called them "Trump Derangement Therapy Sessions" [1]. Conservative commentators have questioned their effectiveness, with PJ Media asking bluntly, "Another Attempt at 'No Kings' Today? Why?" [16].

What Do Protests Actually Achieve?

The question of whether mass protests produce measurable policy change is contested terrain. The 2017 Women's March did not immediately alter Trump's first-term agenda. However, research from the University of Chile and other institutions found that the march increased political participation among women and minorities in the 2018 House elections, contributing to the Democratic wave that flipped 40 seats [4][17]. In Michigan, a marcher-founded activist group successfully pushed a ballot initiative for an independent redistricting commission [4].

Other Trump-era protests have had mixed direct results. The Muslim ban protests of January 2017 coincided with legal challenges that eventually led courts to modify the original executive order. Family separation protests in 2018 preceded Trump's executive order ending the practice, though the extent to which protests versus legal and political pressure drove that reversal is debated. Post-2020 election protests had no discernible impact on the certification of results [4].

No Kings organizers point to one concrete victory: the withdrawal of some federal law enforcement personnel from the Twin Cities after images of agents using pepper balls, tear gas, and pepper spray against Minneapolis protesters prompted concern even within the Trump administration over "optics" [11]. Whether that constitutes a lasting policy change or a tactical retreat remains an open question.

The Cost to Cities

The financial burden on municipalities hosting large-scale demonstrations is substantial — though for many cities, the costs attributable to No Kings events are dwarfed by what they've already spent responding to federal immigration operations.

In Minneapolis, the police department reported over $6 million in overtime and standby pay in less than a month during early 2025 — more than double the city's entire annual police overtime budget of $2.3 million [18]. In Los Angeles, the LAPD spent approximately $17 million responding to anti-ICE protests over a single nine-day stretch in June 2025, with nearly $12 million going to overtime [18]. The department's overtime for that month hit $41 million — well above its typical $18–30 million monthly range [18].

For the March 28 protests specifically, St. Paul has deployed roughly 300 officers across the Capitol grounds and three rally staging sites, with coordination across the St. Paul Police Department, Ramsey County Sheriff's Office, Minnesota State Patrol, and the state Department of Natural Resources [5]. Road closures will affect MLK Boulevard, John Ireland Boulevard, Cedar Street, and portions of Wabasha Street [5]. Minneapolis faces an $81 million budget deficit, making any additional security costs politically sensitive [6].

From Protest to Power: The Midterm Strategy

Organizers have been explicit that the March 28 protests are not an end in themselves but a staging ground for the 2026 midterm elections.

"Voters who decide elections, the people who do the door knocking and the voter registration and all of the work of turning protests into power — they are taking to the streets right now, and they are furious," one organizer told reporters [10]. Following the national day of action, the coalition plans to pivot toward local legislative advocacy and voter protection initiatives [10].

The geographic data supports a midterm-oriented strategy. The surge of organizing in competitive suburban areas — precisely the districts that tend to swing midterm elections — suggests deliberate targeting. Indivisible and other national organizers have provided training and digital tools that extend beyond protest logistics into sustained political engagement [12].

Whether the movement can convert street energy into ballot-box results is the central unanswered question. The 2017 Women's March provided a template: that protest didn't stop Trump's first-term agenda, but it seeded local organizing infrastructure that contributed to the 2018 Democratic House majority. No Kings organizers are betting the same pattern holds at a larger scale.

Security and Civil Liberties Concerns

Law enforcement agencies have generally signaled cooperation with protest organizers while preparing for potential flashpoints. In St. Paul, Deputy Chief Hallstrom described a "robust security plan" while emphasizing flexibility: "We'll have to adjust to whatever shows up" [5]. Officers have been encouraged to engage positively with attendees [5].

The Department of Homeland Security struck a more cautionary tone in a statement about protests in Portland, saying that "peaceful protesters and members of the media should exercise caution" and that "being near unlawful activities does come with risks" — language that civil liberties advocates read as a veiled warning [11].

The backdrop is significant. During Operation Metro Surge, federal agents used pepper balls, tear gas, and pepper spray against protesters in Minneapolis, creating confrontations that drew national attention [11]. The memory of those clashes — and the ongoing federal law enforcement presence in cities across the country — colors the security calculus for March 28.

No reports of organized counter-protests at scale have emerged in the lead-up to the event, though conservative media has framed the protests as performative and ineffective [16].

What Comes Next

The No Kings movement has accomplished something rare for American protest movements: sustained, escalating mobilization over three rounds spanning nine months. Each successive event has been larger than the last, the geographic reach has expanded into conservative territory, and the organizational infrastructure has grown more sophisticated.

The open question is whether the movement has a theory of change beyond demonstration. Organizers have articulated specific demands — end the Iran war, stop ICE raids, restore healthcare funding — and a clear electoral strategy pegged to the 2026 midterms [7][10]. But the history of American protest movements suggests that the path from street mobilization to policy outcomes is neither direct nor guaranteed [4][17].

What is clear is the scale of public dissatisfaction. With Trump's approval at historic lows, oil prices elevated by a war that most Americans oppose, and federal agents operating in communities across the country under expanded authorities, the conditions for mass mobilization exist independent of any organizing effort. The No Kings Coalition has built the infrastructure to channel that discontent. Whether it translates into lasting political change will be determined not on March 28, but in November.